Skip to content

Impact of Skin Type on Wonud Healing and Scarring Following Facial Skin Surgery

Impact of Baumann Skin Type on Wound Healing and Scar Formation Following Facial Skin Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07384299
Enrollment
173
Registered
2026-02-03
Start date
2025-06-15
Completion date
2026-01-15
Last updated
2026-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cyst, Lipoma, Nevus, Scar, Seborrheic Keratosis (SK)

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn how an individual's skin type influences the wound healing process and scar formation in Chinese patients undergoing facial dermatologic surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: How does skin type affect the quality of wound healing after facial surgery? How does skin type affect the formation of hypertrophic scars after facial surgery? Researchers will compare groups of patients with different skin types (classified by the Baumann Skin Type) to see if there are significant differences in their healing outcomes and scar characteristics. Participants in this study will: Receive standard facial dermatologic surgery as part of their clinical care. Have their skin type assessed preoperatively. Undergo scheduled postoperative follow-up assessments at 7 and 90 days to evaluate wound healing and scar development using standardized scales.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 14 and 60 years. * Clinically and postoperatively pathologically diagnosed with a facial benign tumor (e.g., melanocytic nevus, sebaceous cyst, seborrheic keratosis, etc.) and having undergone standard surgical treatment. * Voluntary participation in this study with written informed consent obtained. * Commitment to comply with all study protocols and to complete all follow-up visits and data collection procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically or postoperatively diagnosed with a facial malignant tumor. * Wounds requiring staged excision or planned for secondary intention healing. * Surgical site located on or adjacent to the mucosal surface. * Known history of allergy to any medications or dressings to be used during or after surgery. * Presence of systemic diseases that significantly impair wound healing (e.g., poorly controlled diabetes, immunodeficiency disorders, active infections). * Current use of medications affecting wound healing or scar formation (e.g., long-term systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressants). * Pregnancy or lactation. * Refusal to provide written informed consent, or anticipated inability to comply with study follow-up and data collection. * Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial. * Any other condition deemed by the investigator as likely to interfere with study results or increase participant risk.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale version 2.0 (POSAS 2.0)3-month follow-upThis scale comprises two separate subscales: the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (completed by the clinician) and the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (completed by the participant). The Observer Scale evaluates six items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area) on a scale from 1 ("like normal skin") to 10 ("the worst scar imaginable"), with a total score ranging from 6 (best) to 60 (worst). The Patient Scale evaluates six items (pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity) on a scale from 1 ("no, not at all") to 10 ("yes, very much"), with a total score also ranging from 6 (best) to 60 (worst). For both subscales, a higher score indicates a worse scar quality.
modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (mSBSES)3-month follow-upEvaluations were independently performed by two clinicians who were blinded to group allocation. The scale comprises four items: scar width, height, color, and suture marks. Each item is scored from 0 to 2 points, where a score of 2 represents the closest resemblance to normal skin, and 0 represents the worst appearance. The total score ranges from 0 to 8, with a higher score indicating a more ideal scar appearance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Postoperative Edema7-day follow-upAssessed by direct clinical examination. Unit: % of participants with the presence of edema.
Incidence of Wound SuppurationAssessed by direct clinical examination. Unit: % of participants with the presence of suppuration.7-day follow-up
Incidence of Peri-wound Erythema7-day follow-upAssessed by direct clinical examination. Unit: % of participants with the presence of erythema.
Incidence of Wound Tenderness7-day follow-upAssessed by patient report. Unit: % of participants reporting tenderness.
Incidence of Postoperative Hemorrhage7-day follow-upAssessed by direct clinical examination. Unit: % of participants with active bleeding or hematoma formation.
Incidence of Peri-wound Ecchymosis7-day follow-uoAssessed by direct clinical examination. Unit: % of participants with the presence of ecchymosis.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026