Skip to content

Autophagy-Enhancers to Reduce Sleep Disturbances

Autophagy-Enhancers to Reduce Sleep Disturbances: A Combined Approach

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07383311
Acronym
SpSleep
Enrollment
76
Registered
2026-02-03
Start date
2025-10-28
Completion date
2029-05-01
Last updated
2026-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer's Disease, Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)

Keywords

Mild Cognitive Impairment, Autophagy, sleep, Spermidine, memory consolidation, electroencephalography, polysomnography, randomized controlled trial, subjective cognitive decline

Brief summary

This clinical trial investigates the effects of spermidine supplementation on sleep quality and sleep-dependent memory consolidation in older adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), two populations at increased risk of future cognitive decline and dementia. Impaired sleep has been identified as a modifiable factor contributing to cognitive decline, and interventions targeting sleep architecture could offer therapeutic potential to prevent or slow down this decline. Spermidine is a naturally occurring polyamine found in foods such as wheat germ and soybeans. It induces autophagy, a cellular degradation and recycling process essential for neuronal maintenance and function. In animal studies, spermidine has been shown to improve memory performance, reduce neuroinflammation, and support mitochondrial health. Preliminary findings from human trials in individuals with SCD or MCI suggest potential cognitive benefits of spermidine, but results are not unequivocal, and the impact on sleep has not been systematically evaluated. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 76 participants aged 55 to 70 years with SCD or MCI will receive either spermidine (6 mg/day) or a placebo for 12 weeks. Sleep will be evaluated using overnight EEG in a controlled laboratory setting, focusing on measures such as slow-wave sleep and sleep spindle activity. Memory performance will be assessed before and after the intervention using standardized neuropsychological testing. Numerical skills will be tested at baseline only to compare SCD and MCI participants with healthy controls. Blood samples will be collected to quantify metabolic indicators, neurodegeneration-related biomarkers, and autophagy-associated proteins. A control group of 38 cognitively healthy individuals will undergo comparable sleep and cognitive assessments without receiving any supplementation. The primary objective of the study is to characterize the impact of spermidine on sleep-dependent memory consolidation and to identify associated biological changes relevant to aging and neurodegeneration. The results may inform the development of non-pharmacological strategies aimed at preserving cognitive function in individuals at risk for dementia.

Detailed description

Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) represent early stages along the continuum of cognitive decline preceding dementia. Individuals with SCD report persistent cognitive complaints despite normal performance on standardized cognitive testing, whereas MCI is characterized by objective cognitive impairment that does not yet interfere substantially with activities of daily living. Both conditions are associated with an elevated risk of progression to Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Disruption of sleep architecture is increasingly implicated in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative disorders, and early interventions targeting sleep-related mechanisms could help delay further cognitive decline. This clinical trial evaluates the effects of spermidine supplementation on sleep quality and sleep-dependent memory consolidation in older adults with SCD or MCI. Following an adaptation night and an initial baseline sleep assessment with overnight electroencephalography (EEG), participants will be randomly assigned to either the spermidine or placebo group. The intervention consists of a daily oral dose of 6 mg spermidine (administered as three 2 mg sachets), continued over a 12-week period. The trial employs a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Placebo sachets, identical in appearance and taste, contain only microcrystalline cellulose. After the 12-week supplementation period, participants will return for a second overnight EEG assessment. A healthy control group (n=38), matched for age and sex, will undergo comparable baseline assessments but will not receive any intervention. These data will provide normative reference values for sleep and cognitive parameters. The primary objective of the study is to assess the impact of spermidine on sleep architecture, measured via overnight polysomnography, with a specific focus on slow-wave sleep and sleep spindle activity, EEG markers associated with sleep-dependent memory consolidation and known to decline with age and neurodegeneration. Secondary outcomes include changes in memory consolidation (assessed using a battery of cognitive tasks that target declarative, procedural, and visuospatial memory domains), as well as numerical skills (tested via e.g., digit-letter-decision task, Berlin Numeracy Test). Testing occurs before and after each EEG night to evaluate overnight consolidation effects. All participants will wear actigraphs prior to both EEG nights to monitor sleep-wake cycles and physical activity. Additional biological endpoints will examine changes in circulating neuropeptides, insulin-glucose homeostasis, and autophagy-related biomarkers. Blood samples are collected at each EEG session and two weeks after the start of supplementation. Physiological assessments include measurements of inflammatory markers (e.g., interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), neuroprotective factors (e.g., Neuropeptide Y, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) hypusination), and metabolic indicators (e.g., fasting insulin, glucose, and lipid profiles). Participants will undergo structural brain imaging using a 3-Tesla MRI scanner to exclude individuals with comorbid neurological conditions (e.g., prior stroke, other neurodegenerative diseases) and to assess brain morphology. Eligibility is determined through standardized pre-screening procedures, including clinical interviews and neuropsychological assessments. The study includes 76 participants with SCD or MCI, aged 55-70 years, randomly allocated to either the spermidine or placebo group (n=38 per group). The sample size provides adequate statistical power to detect medium-to-large effect sizes, based on previous pilot findings and anticipated attrition rates. This study aims to investigate the effects of spermidine supplementation on neurophysiological and cognitive outcomes in individuals with early-stage cognitive decline. The results are expected to contribute to the growing body of evidence evaluating spermidine as a safe, nutrition-based strategy for maintaining brain health and cognitive function in the context of aging.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTSpermidine Supplementation

supplementation of 6 mg Spermidine per day across 3 doses

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTDietary Placebo

supplementation of 6 mg Placebo per day across 3 doses (placebo consists of maltodextrin, rice extract microcrystalline cellulose mixture, citric acid (anhydrous), silicon oxide (precipitated, E551))

Sponsors

University Medicine Greifswald
Lead SponsorOTHER
Department of Experimental Neuroimmunology, University Medicine
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Institute of Biology, Department of Biology, Chemistry, Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

(SCD participants): * Men and women * Written consent to participate in the study * German at native speaker level * Age between 55 and 70 years * Subjective Cognitive Decline operationalized as: 1. Subjectively reported decline in cognitive function (particularly memory) despite objectively normal cognitive performance (e.g., WMS-LM) 2. Preservation of functional independence 3. No dementia Inclusion Criteria (MCI patients): * Men and women * Written consent to participate in the study * German at native speaker level * Age between 55 and 70 years * Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) operationalized as: 1. A change in cognitive abilities reported by the patient, relatives or clinic staff (i.e. historical or observed evidence of deterioration over time) 2. Objective evidence of memory impairment (at least 1.0 Standard Deviation (SD) below the normal range on the Wechsler Logical Memory Scale (WMS-LM)); other cognitive domains may also be affected (i.e. amnestic MCI and amnestic + MCI) 3. Preservation of independence of functional abilities 4. No dementia

Exclusion criteria

(SCD and MCI participants): * Patients who are unable to give informed consent * Polyamine intake via dietary supplements and/or participation in corresponding intervention studies * Dementia according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) * Any condition that impairs clinical or neuropsychological examination procedures * Diabetes mellitus * Polycystic ovary syndrome * Signs of epilepsy, focal brain lesion or head injury with loss of consciousness or immediate post-injury confusion * Previous stroke * Severe untreated medical problems or unstable medical condition * Current major depressive episode * Psychotic disorder * Bipolar disorder * Current or previous substance abuse * Other neurodegenerative disease, e.g. Parkinson's disease * Vascular dementia * Alcohol abuse * Participation in an interventional study in the last 3 months and during the entire study period * Sleep disorders * Taking medication that primarily affects the central nervous system (e.g. antipsychotics, antidepressants, benzodiazepines or any type of over-the-counter sleep-inducing medication such as valerian; anti-dementia medication) * Known intolerances or allergies to wheat germ, gluten or histamine Inclusion criteria (healthy controls): * Men and women * Written consent to participate in the study * German at native speaker level * Age between 55 and 70 years * Subjective cognitive disorders are denied

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effects of spermidine supplementation on sleep quality as measured by sleep spindle count assessed from EEGbaseline, 12-week follow-upIndividual mean power spectra are calculated. Subsequently, the mean power is calculated in the following EEG bands: slow frontal spindle (8-12 Hz), fast parietal spindle (12-15 Hz), and the number of slow frontal and fast parietal discrete spindles are counted. Spindle detection is performed based on an algorithm adopted from previous studies. For the spermidine effect, baseline and follow-up EEG data are compared with each other.
Effects of spermidine supplementation on sleep quality as measured by electroencephalography (EEG) mean power spectrabaseline, 12-week follow-upIndividual mean power spectra are calculated. Subsequently, the mean power is calculated in the following EEG bands: slow oscillations (0.5-1 Hz), low delta (1-1.5 Hz), delta (1-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), and beta (15-25 Hz). For the spermidine effect, baseline and follow-up EEG data are compared with each other.
Effects of spermidine supplementation on sleep quality as measured by sleep spindle power assessed from EEGbaseline, 12-week follow-upIndividual mean power spectra are calculated. Subsequently, the mean power is calculated in the following EEG bands: slow frontal spindle (8-12 Hz), fast parietal spindle (12-15 Hz). Spindle power is analyzed as a further measure of spindle activity. Spindle detection is performed based on an algorithm adopted from previous studies. For the spermidine effect, baseline and follow-up EEG data are compared with each other.
Effects of spermidine supplementation on sleep-related alertness as measured by computer-based taskbaseline, 12-week follow-upThe alertness task is trained at adaptation night and assessed at baseline and follow-up before and after sleep. It comprises two runs without and two runs with a prior warning tone. For the spermidine effect, baseline and follow-up task performances of SCD and MCI participants are compared with each other. Task performance is measured by speed (in ms) and hit/false or miss.
Effects of spermidine supplementation on sleep-related visual-spatial memory as measured by computer-based taskbaseline, 12-week follow-upThe visual-spatial memory task is trained at adaptation night and assessed at baseline and follow-up before and after sleep. After an encoding phase consisting of 60 objects (e.g., photo of a band-aid) placed in front of a background (e.g., photo of a treatment room in a doctor's office), a retrieval phase follows directly after encoding in the evening before bedtime, in which 30 randomly selected images from the total of 60 are tested. Participants should memorize the position of the object placed in front of the background and select the correct position by pressing a button. In the next morning, the remaining 30 images are tested in a recall phase. Task performance is measured by speed (in ms) and hit/false or miss. For the spermidine effect, baseline and follow-up task performances of SCD and MCI participants are compared with each other.
Effects of spermidine supplementation on sleep-related verbal memory as measured by computer-based taskbaseline, 12-week follow-upThe verbal memory task is trained at adaptation night and assessed at baseline and follow-up before and after sleep. After an encoding phase consisting of 44 word pairs, a retrieval phase follows directly after encoding in the evening before bedtime, in which all word pairs are tested in randomized order. The next morning, all word pairs are tested in a recall phase. Task performance is measured by hit/false or miss. For the spermidine effect, baseline and follow-up task performances of SCD and MCI participants are compared with each other.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differences in autophagy-related blood markers pre and post spermidine intervention in SCD and MCI as measured by polyamine concentrationbaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 12-week follow-upconcentration in nmol / mg Protein assessed via Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)
Differences in sleep quality between SCD or MCI and healthy controls (HC) as measured by electroencephalography (EEG) mean power spectrabaseline dataIndividual mean power spectra are calculated. Subsequently, the mean power is calculated in the following EEG bands: slow oscillations (0.5-1 Hz), low delta (1-1.5 Hz), delta (1-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), and beta (15-25 Hz). The differences between SCD / MCI and healthy controls are assessed from baseline EEG data.
Differences in sleep quality between SCD or MCI and healthy controls (HC) as measured by sleep spindle count assessed from EEGbaseline dataIndividual mean power spectra are calculated. Subsequently, the mean power is calculated in the following EEG bands: slow frontal spindle (8-12 Hz), fast parietal spindle (12-15 Hz), and the number of slow frontal and fast parietal discrete spindles are counted. Spindle detection is performed based on an algorithm adopted from previous studies. The differences between SCD / MCI and healthy controls are assessed from baseline EEG data.
Differences in sleep quality between SCD or MCI and healthy controls (HC) as measured by sleep spindle power assessed from EEGbaseline dataIndividual mean power spectra are calculated. Subsequently, the mean power is calculated in the following EEG bands: slow frontal spindle (8-12 Hz), fast parietal spindle (12-15 Hz). Spindle power is analyzed as a further measure of spindle activity. Spindle detection is performed based on an algorithm adopted from previous studies. The differences between SCD / MCI and healthy controls are assessed from baseline EEG data.
Differences in autophagy-related blood markers pre and post spermidine intervention in SCD or MCI as measured by eIF5A hypusinationbaseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 12-week follow-upassessed via Hypusinated eIF5A levels (Western Blot) from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)
Differences in neuropeptide Y blood levels pre and post spermidine intervention in SCD or MCIbaseline, 12-week follow-upNeuropeptide Y blood levels in pg/ml analyzed from serum blood sample
Differences in sleep-related alertness between SCD or MCI participants and healthy controls as measured by computer-based taskbaselineThe alertness task is trained at adaptation night and assessed at baseline and follow-up before and after sleep. It comprises two runs without and two runs with a prior warning tone. The differences between SCD / MCI and healthy controls are assessed from baseline task data. Task performance is measured by speed (in ms) and hit/false or miss.
Differences in sleep-related visual-spatial memory between SCD or MCI participants and healthy controls as measured by computer-based taskbaselineThe visual-spatial memory task is trained at adaptation night and assessed at baseline and follow-up before and after sleep. After an encoding phase consisting of 60 objects (e.g., photo of a band-aid) placed in front of a background (e.g., photo of a treatment room in a doctor's office), a retrieval phase follows directly after encoding in the evening before bedtime, in which 30 randomly selected images from the total of 60 are tested. Participants should memorize the position of the object placed in front of the background and select the correct position by pressing a button. In the next morning, the remaining 30 images are tested in a recall phase. Task performance is measured by speed (in ms) and hit/false or miss. The differences between SCD / MCI and healthy controls are assessed from baseline task data.
Differences in sleep-related verbal memory between SCD or MCI participants and healthy controls as measured by computer-based taskbaselineThe verbal memory task is trained at adaptation night and assessed at baseline and follow-up before and after sleep. After an encoding phase consisting of 44 word pairs, a retrieval phase follows directly after encoding in the evening before bedtime, in which all word pairs are tested in randomized order. The next morning, all word pairs are tested in a recall phase. Task performance is measured by hit/false or miss. The differences between SCD / MCI and healthy controls are assessed from baseline task data.
Differences in neuropeptide Y blood levels between SCD or MCI and healthy controlsbaseline datablood levels in pg/ml analyzed from serum blood sample
Differences in autophagy-related blood markers between SCD or MCI and healthy controls as measured by polyamine concentrationbaseline dataconcentration in nmol / mg Protein assessed via Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)
Differences in autophagy-related blood markers between SCD or MCI and healthy controls as measured by eIF5A hypusinationbaseline dataassessed via Hypusinated eIF5A levels (Western Blot) from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)
Differences in numerical skills between SCD or MCI patients and healthy controls as measured by lexical decision taskassessed at baseline onlyParticipants complete a computer-based lexical decision task, in which a row of six symbols is presented after a fixation cross. Depending on the condition, the test subjects must decide by pressing a key on the keyboard whether the row presented contains a letter (e.g., condition 1) or a digit (e.g., condition 2). Each condition consists of two blocks. After the first block, there is a short pause before the second block starts. The condition (digit or letter) with which the trial starts is randomized for each test subject.
Differences in numerical skills between SCD or MCI participants and healthy controls as measured by Berlin Numeracy Testassessed at baseline onlyThe Berlin Numeracy Test contains 4 short, text-based questions testing statistical numeracy and risk literacy, requiring Bayesian inference for problems like understanding probabilities in health concerns (e.g., poisonous mushrooms) or lotteries, often presenting data in relative/absolute numbers and asking for probability estimates. Correct answers scored for a total of 0-4 points.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTAgnes Flöel, Prof. Dr.
agnes.floeel@med.uni-greifswald.de+49 (0)3834 86-6815
CONTACTSilke M Wortha, Dr.
SilkeMaria.Wortha@med.uni-greifswald.de+49 3834 86 - 6704

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026