Skip to content

Perineural Dextrose Versus Local Anesthetic Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis

A Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Effectiveness of Perineural Dextrose and Conventional Local Anesthetic Injections in Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07381621
Enrollment
86
Registered
2026-02-02
Start date
2026-02-02
Completion date
2026-11-01
Last updated
2026-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Perineural Injection, Dextrose Injection, Local Anesthetic Injection, Pain, WOMAC, Observational Study

Brief summary

This prospective observational study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of perineural 5% dextrose injections and perineural local anesthetic injections in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Adult patients receiving routine perineural injection therapy will be followed for six months. Pain intensity and functional outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment using validated clinical assessment tools.

Detailed description

Knee osteoarthritis is a common degenerative joint disease associated with chronic pain, functional limitation, and reduced quality of life. Various non-surgical treatment modalities have been used to manage symptoms; however, the effectiveness of these treatments may be limited due to the complex pain mechanisms involved in osteoarthritis. Perineural injection therapy has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive treatment option targeting neurogenic inflammation around peripheral sensory nerves. Perineural 5% dextrose injection is thought to reduce pain by modulating neurogenic inflammation, while local anesthetic injections are commonly used in clinical practice for symptomatic relief. This study is designed as a prospective observational cohort study conducted in a routine clinical setting. Patients aged 40 to 65 years with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis who are treated with perineural injections as part of standard care will be included. The choice of injectate (perineural 5% dextrose or perineural local anesthetic) will be determined based on clinical considerations and patient preference; no randomization or protocol-driven assignment will be performed. Pain severity will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Functional status will be assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Additional clinical parameters, including knee range of motion measured by goniometry and quadriceps muscle strength assessed by manual muscle testing, will also be recorded. Assessments will be performed at baseline, and at 1, 3, and 6 months following treatment. Clinical outcomes of the two treatment groups will be compared to evaluate changes in pain and functional status over time. The findings of this study are expected to contribute real-world evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of perineural 5% dextrose and local anesthetic injections in the management of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPerineural 5% Dextrose Injection

Perineural injection of 5% dextrose solution administered around periarticular sensory nerves of the knee as part of routine clinical practice.

PROCEDUREPerineural Local Anesthetic Injection

Perineural injection of local anesthetic administered around periarticular sensory nerves of the knee as part of routine clinical practice.

Sponsors

Ankara Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis * Clinical/radiological diagnosis * Knee pain ≥ 3 months * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Prior knee surgery * Recent intra-articular injection * Inflammatory rheumatic disease * Severe systemic or neurological disease * Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Knee Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale [VAS])Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 monthsChange in Knee Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) Change from baseline in knee pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 100-mm horizontal line anchored at 0 = no pain and 100 = worst imaginable pain; higher scores indicate worse pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Functional Status (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC])Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 monthsChange from baseline in WOMAC total score (and/or subscales: pain, stiffness, and physical function) assessing knee osteoarthritis-related symptoms. The WOMAC consists of 24 items with a total score ranging from 0 to 96; higher scores indicate worse symptoms and worse functional status.
Change in Knee Range of MotionBaseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 monthsChange in knee joint range of motion measured using goniometry.
Change in Quadriceps Muscle StrengthBaseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 monthsChange in quadriceps muscle strength assessed by manual muscle testing.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTNadide Koca, M.D.
nadide.koca@gmail.com+905376843434
CONTACTHakan Genç, PROF. M.D.
hakangenc06@hotmail.com05359780666

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 10, 2026