Skip to content

Using Simulation-based Team Training to Improve Psychological Safety and Relational Coordination as Well as Conducting a Process Evaluation

Simulation-Based Team Training to Improve Psychological Safety and Relational Coordination in Clinical Teams

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07381270
Acronym
InfecSIM
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-02-02
Start date
2025-03-01
Completion date
2028-01-01
Last updated
2026-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Culture, Medical Education, Simulation, Crisis Resource Management, Simulation Based Medical Education, Simulation Training

Keywords

Simulation-based team training, relational coordination, psychologically safety

Brief summary

Simulation-based team training is increasingly used in hospitals to support teamwork and communication, particularly in situations that are complex or time-critical. While such training is known to improve observable team behaviours, less is known about how it is implemented in everyday clinical work and how it influences relational aspects of teamwork, such as psychological safety and relational coordination. This study explores the implementation and perceived impact of a simulation-based training programme focused on infectious disease management in a hospital department. Psychological safety refers to whether staff feel safe to speak up, ask questions, and express concerns, while relational coordination concerns how well different professional groups communicate, share goals, and align their work. Using a qualitative process and outcome evaluation, the study examines how the simulation activities were introduced, adapted, and experienced by different staff groups, and how participants perceived their influence on collaboration and professional behaviour. Data are collected through interviews with clinical staff and managers, questionnaires measuring psychological safety and relational coordination before and after the intervention, and systematic registration of simulation activities (including who participated, what was trained, and when and where simulations took place). By combining process evaluation with an exploration of perceived outcomes, the study aims to provide insight into how simulation-based team training functions as a behavioural intervention in complex clinical settings, and how it may support psychologically safe and well-coordinated teamwork in everyday practice.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSimulation-based team training

Staff participates in a simulation-based training initiative

Sponsors

University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A controlled intervention study comparing two groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Employed in the included departments * Profession as a doctor or nurse

Exclusion criteria

* If participants are employed in both intervention and control group during the project period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Psychological safetyBaseline and immediately after the intervention period.Psychological safety will be assessed using the Team Psychological Safety scale (Edmondson). The scale consists of 7 items rated on a 1-7 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater psychological safety. The outcome will be reported as the mean questionnaire score. Qualitative interviews are not included in this outcome measure.
Relational coordinationBaseline and immediately after the intervention period.Relational coordination will be assessed using the Relational Coordination Survey (Gittell). Items are rated on a 1-5 scale, with higher scores indicating stronger relational coordination. The outcome will be reported as the mean questionnaire score. Qualitative interviews are not included in this outcome measure.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 6, 2026