Nasal Obstruction
Conditions
Brief summary
Nasal obstruction (NO) affects \ 30% of the population and is a very common reason for consultation in otorhinolaryngology (ORL). In the majority of cases, the origin is inflammatory (allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis) while in a minority of cases, the origin is structural, including septal deviation and inferior turbinate hypertrophy. NO significantly impairs patients' quality of life (QoL) and olfactory performance and also represents a contributing factor and comorbidity in asthma and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Several questionnaires for assessing QoL are available and routinely used to evaluate the impact of NO on patients : VAS, NOSE score, SNOT-22, and RhinoQOL score. Several objective functional methods for assessing NO have been described : acoustic rhinometry, nasal peak inspiratory flow, and active rhinomanometry. Rhinomanometry is a simple, non-invasive functional assessment method that allows for objective and quantitative analysis of nasal airway patency, thereby complementing the clinical and imaging evaluation of NO. It has been recommended for the diagnosis of NO in cases of chronic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Rhinomanometry comprises anterior active (AAR), posterior, and per-nasal rhinomanometry. AAR is the most commonly used method and is the only technique routinely available to clinicians. AAR provides precise information regarding the presence of nasal resistance responsible for NO. However, it should not be used as a standalone diagnostic tool due to its poor correlation with QoL questionnaires such as VAS and NOSE. Whether used alone or in combination with nasal decongestants, AAR provides a high predictive value for the outcomes of septoplasty and laser-assisted turbinoplasty. When surgery is indicated, its performance depends on: * type of obstruction or anatomical abnormality identified on clinical examination and/or computed tomography and/or AAR; * patient's symptoms and impairment of QoL NOSE and SNOT-22; * failure of a well-conducted first-line medical nasal treatment. Thus, in cases of septal deviation, septoplasty is performed; in cases of inferior turbinate mucosal hypertrophy with failure of medical treatment, turbinoplasty is performed; and in cases of mixed lesions, septo-turbinoplasty is performed. However, the concordance rate between the surgical technique indicated by clinical examination and computed tomography and the indications suggested by AAR is only 48.5%.
Interventions
PROCEDUREpreoperative rhinomanometry
The performance of AAR requires a pressure sensor placed within a facial mask to measure the pressure at the entrance of the ventilated nasal cavity. Another sensor is placed in the nasal vestibule of the contralateral nasal cavity to extrapolate the pressure at the exit of the ventilated nasal cavity. Measurements are therefore performed alternately on the right and left sides, but never on both sides simultaneously. AAR can be performed at rest in the seated position after 20 min in the supine position, or during forced inspiration. In our practice, AAR is performed without the use of nasal decongestants. Normal values of nasal resistance measured by rhinomanometry are as follows: * Uninasal resistance ≤ 6 cmH₂O/L/s (or 0.6 Pa/cm³/s); * Binasal resistance ≤ 3 cmH₂O/L/s (or 0.3 Pa/cm³/s); * Uninasal resistance ≥ 0.6 Pa/cm³/s, with or without vasoconstrictor, suggests septal deviation; * Binasal resistance after VC ≥ 0.3 Pa/cm³/s suggests bilateral inferior turbinate hypertrophy
Sponsors
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients aged 18 years or older with nasal obstruction (NO). 2. Patients scheduled for surgery: septoplasty ± turbinoplasty ± rhinoplasty for nasal obstruction. 3. Patients who have undergone a preoperative rhinomanometry assessment. 4. Patients consented to participation
Exclusion criteria
1. Nasal polyps. 2. Chronic edematous-purulent rhinosinusitis (e.g., cystic fibrosis). 3. Crusting rhinosinusitis (e.g., sarcoidosis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis \[Wegener's\]). 4. Current or previously treated nasal or sinus tumors, or patients undergoing tumor work-up
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the reliability of an abnormal (vs. normal) binary result of preoperative anterior active rhinomanometry as an independent tool for confirming the indication for endonasal surgery in patients presenting with nasal obstruction. | the day of surgery | The result was considered normal if: Uninasal resistance ≤ 6 cmH₂O/L/s (or 0.6 Pa/cm³/s); Binasal resistance ≤ 3 cmH₂O/L/s (or 0.3 Pa/cm³/s). The criteria is 1) Percentage of patients with an abnormal versus normal preoperative AAR result; and 2) calculation of the positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of AAR as an independent tool for confirming surgical indication. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the correlation between the preoperative NOSE score and a preoperative AAR considered abnormal. | preoperative visit | Correlation coefficient between the preoperative NOSE score and the preoperative AAR result (normal/abnormal). |
| To evaluate the correlation between the preoperative SNOT-22 score and a preoperative AAR considered abnormal. | preoperative visit | Correlation coefficient between the preoperative SNOT-22 score and the preoperative AAR result (normal/abnormal) |
| To assess the improvement in patients' quality of life at 3 months postoperatively using the NOSE score in patients with a preoperative AAR considered abnormal | 3 months after surgery | Difference between pre- and 3-month postoperative NOSE scores in patients with an abnormal preoperative AAR result |
| To assess the improvement in patients' quality of life at 3 months postoperatively using the SNOT-22 score in patients with a preoperative AAR considered abnormal | 3 months after surgery | Difference between pre- and 3-month postoperative SNOT-22 scores in patients with an abnormal preoperative AAR result |
| To assess the improvement in AAR at 3 months postoperatively in patients with a preoperative AAR considered abnormal | 3 months after surgery | Percentage of AAR results significantly improved at 3 months postoperatively in patients with an abnormal preoperative AAR |
| To assess the improvement in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) at 3 months postoperatively in patients with identified obstructive sleep apnea and a preoperative AAR considered abnormal | 3 months after surgery | Difference between pre- and 3-month postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in patients with identified sleep apnea and an abnormal preoperative AAR result |
| To assess the improvement in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence at 3 months postoperatively in patients with identified obstructive sleep apnea and a preoperative AAR considered abnormal. | 3 months after surgery | Difference between pre- and 3-month postoperative adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with identified sleep apnea and an abnormal preoperative AAR result. |
Countries
France
Contacts
CONTACTSophie Lafond
STUDY_DIRECTORHeritsilavo Eloi RAMILISON, MD
Centre Hospitalier de la Dracénie - Draguignan
Outcome results
None listed