Functional Cognitive Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
Functional Cognitive Disorder, Brief Interventions, Feasibility, Pilot, Attention Training
Brief summary
The goal of this study is to learn if a single session intervention for people with Functional Cognitive Disorder (FCD) is feasible and acceptable. The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the impact of a single session intervention on FCD symptoms, functional impairment, and quality of life in people with FCD? What is the feasibility and acceptability of piloting a single session intervention for people with FCD. Participants will: * Complete questionnaires about cognitive concerns, anxiety, depression, functional impairment and quality of life * Visit the clinic for a single session intervention including practicing the Attention Training Technique (ATT) * Complete 2 telephone calls with a researcher to discuss their use of the intervention and to complete the same questionnaires from their clinic visit, and a questionnaire about their experience of the study and intervention.
Interventions
Brief psychological intervention including attention training
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adults aged 65 or below * Meet criteria for diagnosis of FCD (criteria include normal MRI results with no neurological diagnosis, and symptoms that are not explained by any other medical condition, performance at routine pre-baseline neuropsychological assessment within the service) * Not taking part in any other intervention study or trial
Exclusion criteria
* Aged above 65 years * Lack capacity to consent * MRI results not in normal range * Neurological diagnosis * Indication of severe low mood or depression (from clinical interview, routine measures) * Taking part in any other intervention study or trial
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Participant recruitment, feasibility and retention from baseline to follow-up | From enrollment to follow-up 6 weeks post-intervention. | • Number of participants recruited and retention rate (number and percentage of participants completing post-intervention measures) will be recorded. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of the study intervention at follow-up | Post-intervention follow-up at 6 weeks. | • At follow-up, participants will complete a questionnaire to collect information on acceptability of the study and intervention (Theoretical framework of acceptability \[TFA\] questionnaire; Sekhon et al., 2022). |
| Change in symptoms of depression from enrolment to post-intervention follow-up | At enrolment and at follow-up 6 weeks post-intervention | Participants will complete questionnaire at enrolment and at follow-up post-intervention: • Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) (Kroenke et al., 2001) |
| Change in symptoms of anxiety from enrolment to post-intervention follow-up | At enrolment and at follow-up 6 weeks post-intervention | Participants will complete questionnaire at enrolment and at follow-up post-intervention: • Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 questionnaire (GAD- 7) (Spitzer et al., 2006) |
| Change in functional impairment from enrolment to post-intervention follow-up | At enrolment and at follow-up 6 weeks post-intervention | Participants will complete questionnaire at enrolment and at follow-up post-intervention: • Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) (Mundt et al., 2002) |
| Change in quality of life from enrolment to post-intervention follow-up | At enrolment and at follow-up 6 weeks post-intervention | Participants will complete questionnaire at enrolment and at follow-up post-intervention: • EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)(Herdman et al., 2011) |
| Change in self-reported cognitive symptoms from enrolment to post-intervention follow-up | At enrolment and at follow-up 6 weeks post-intervention | Participants will complete questionnaire at enrolment and at follow-up post-intervention: • The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire 2.0(Goodhew \& Edwards, 2024). |
Countries
United Kingdom