Hallux Valgus
Conditions
Keywords
Hallux Abducto Valgus (HAV), Metatarsophalangeal Joint Alignment, Orthotic Devices, Radiographic Assessment
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an external corrector in realigning the first metatarsophalangeal joint in patients with mild to moderate Hallux Abducto Valgus, according to the Manchester scale. Changes in valgus angle will be assessed through radiographs, along with pain, comfort and adherence, comparing results with a control group.
Detailed description
Introduction and Rationale Hallux Abducto Valgus (HAV) is the most common forefoot deformity, often associated with pain and functional limitations. Its development is multifactorial, and although surgical and conservative treatments exist, evidence regarding the real effectiveness of corrective orthopedic devices in early stages is scarce. This study seeks to provide scientific rigor to a device frequently recommended in clinical practice by evaluating its ability to correct alignment and improve symptoms. Main and Secondary Objectives The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of the corrector in realigning the first toe by measuring the valgus angle radiographically at three time points: without the corrector, immediately after application, and after 3 months. Secondary objectives include evaluating pain (VAS), comfort, adherence, device fit, changes in plantar pressure (static and dynamic), patient satisfaction, and differences compared to the control group. Study Design and Population This is an experimental study involving a group of 35 subjects diagnosed with mild or moderate HAV according to the Manchester scale, recruited at the Aquilesia podiatry clinic (Vila-real, Castelló). Recruitment will be carried out through local media, social networks, and referrals from healthcare professionals. Informed consent, anonymity, and compliance with data protection regulations will be ensured. Intervention and Measurements The intervention consists of applying an external hallux alignment corrector. Three radiographic measurements of the metatarsophalangeal angle will be taken: baseline, after corrector placement, and at 3 months. Additional data will include pain, comfort, adherence and device adjustment. Standardized scales (VAS, satisfaction questionnaires) and Excel-based data recording will be used. Data Processing and Analysis Data will be collected by a podiatrist and anonymized before analysis. Intra- and intergroup differences will be evaluated using appropriate statistical tests, considering variables such as sex, age, and degree of deformity. The study aims to determine whether the corrector produces significant improvements in alignment and other clinical parameters, providing evidence for its usefulness in podiatric practice.
Interventions
DEVICEHallux Valgus Orthosis
This study evaluates the effectiveness of an external hallux valgus orthosis in realigning the first metatarsophalangeal joint in patients with mild to moderate HAV. Two radiographic measurements of the valgus angle will be taken: at baseline and after 3 months of daily orthosis use. Participants will receive instructions for proper placement and adjustment. Secondary outcomes include pain (VAS), comfort, satisfaction, plantar pressure analysis (static/dynamic), device fit, and adherence. Data will be collected by podiatrists and anonymized for analysis.
Sponsors
University of Valencia
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Sex: Male or female Age: 18 to 80 years Cooperative subject, informed of the need and duration of follow-up visits, ensuring full compliance with the protocol/study, and having signed informed consent No previous surgery on the foot and/or ankle Mild and/or moderate Hallux Valgus (Manchester Scale)
Exclusion criteria
* Patient with severe arteriopathy Patient with severe edema Patient with sensory neuropathy Patients who have used additional pharmacological treatments (analgesics/anti-inflammatories) during the entire study period Severe Hallux Valgus (Manchester Scale) Any systemic disease affecting the musculoskeletal system Rheumatoid arthritis involving the first metatarsophalangeal joint Instability of the first metatarsophalangeal joint History of previous foot and/or ankle surgery Hyperpronated foot with FPI \>10 Severe pathological genu varum or valgum Pregnant women or suspected pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Radiographic Valgus Angle Correction | 3 months | Measurement of the hallux valgus angle on digital radiographs at baseline and after 3 months of orthosis use, to determine the degree of realignment of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Assessment (VAS) | 3 months | Evaluation of pain intensity in the hallux region using the Visual Analog Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain). |
| Comfort and Satisfaction | 3 months | Subjective assessment of comfort, aesthetics, and overall satisfaction with the orthosis through a structured questionnaire. Comfort was evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no comfort and 10 indicates maximum comfort. |
| Device Fit and Adjustment | 1day | Evaluation of orthosis sizing and traction adjustment scored on a 1-10 scale, including ease of placement by the participant. |
| Orthosis Condition After Use | 3 months | Assessment of wear and tear of the device after 3 months, scored on a 1-10 scale. |
| Adherence to Treatment | 3 months | Monitoring of daily orthosis use through self-reported logs and follow-up visits. |
| Purchase Decision | 3 months | Whether the participant would consider buying the orthosis after the study (Yes/No). |
Countries
Spain
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCARMEN GARCÍA GOMARIZ
UNIVERSITAT DE VALÉNCIA DEPARTAMENTO D'INFERMERIA
Outcome results
None listed