Skip to content

Operator Experience and Restorative Clinical Performance of Posterior Composite Restorations

Clinical Performance of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations Placed by Undergraduate Students and Postgraduate Trainees: A Retrospective Study Using USPHS and FDI Criteria

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07375706
Enrollment
200
Registered
2026-01-29
Start date
2024-06-03
Completion date
2025-02-17
Last updated
2026-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Restoration Failure

Keywords

Pediatric Dentistry, USPHS Criteria, FDI Criteria, Operator Experience, Dental Restoration Longevity

Brief summary

This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by undergraduate dental students and postgraduate specialty trainees in pediatric patients. Dental records of children aged 6 to 13 years who received posterior composite restorations at a university-based pediatric dentistry clinic were reviewed. A total of 200 restorations placed on primary and permanent molars were clinically evaluated during routine follow-up visits using standardized assessment systems. The modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria and the FDI World Dental Federation criteria were used to assess esthetic, functional, and biological outcomes. Evaluations were performed by a blinded examiner, and radiographic assessments were conducted when clinically indicated. Clinical outcomes were compared between operator groups according to training level, follow-up duration, restoration type, tooth type, and endodontic treatment history. The findings of this study aim to provide insight into the impact of operator experience on the clinical success and longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in pediatric dentistry and to support evidence-based improvements in undergraduate and postgraduate dental education.

Detailed description

This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry of a university-based dental faculty to compare the clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by undergraduate dental students and postgraduate specialty trainees. Dental records of pediatric patients aged 6 to 13 years who received posterior resin composite restorations on primary or permanent first and second molars were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 200 restorations were included in the study, of which 100 were placed by undergraduate students and 100 by postgraduate trainees. All restorations were placed using the same microhybrid resin composite material as part of routine clinical care. Restorations were excluded if they were placed by operators outside the defined study groups, if materials other than resin composite were used, if follow-up duration was less than three months, or if the restorations were placed on teeth other than posterior molars. Clinical evaluations were performed during routine follow-up or concurrent dental treatment visits. All restorations were assessed by a blinded examiner using two standardized evaluation systems: the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS-Ryge) criteria and the FDI World Dental Federation (FDI-Hickel) criteria. Esthetic, functional, and biological parameters were evaluated clinically, and radiographic assessments were performed when clinically indicated. Under the USPHS criteria, restorations were categorized as acceptable or unacceptable. According to the FDI criteria, scores of 1-2 were considered successful, score 3 clinically acceptable, and scores of 4-5 unsuccessful. Recorded variables included operator group, restoration type (one-, two-, or three-surface), follow-up duration, tooth type (primary or permanent), patient age, and endodontic treatment history. Clinical outcomes were compared between operator groups and across follow-up intervals to evaluate the influence of operator experience and time on restoration performance. Statistical analyses were performed using appropriate non-parametric tests due to non-normal data distribution. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, and group comparisons were conducted with a significance level set at p \< 0.05. The results of this study aim to clarify the role of operator experience in the long-term success of posterior resin composite restorations in pediatric patients and to contribute to evidence-based improvements in undergraduate and postgraduate dental training programs.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Bezmialem Vakif University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children aged 6 to 13 years at the time of treatment * Patients who received posterior resin composite restorations on primary or permanent first or second molars * Restorations placed by undergraduate dental students or postgraduate specialty trainees in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry * Restorations with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months * Availability of complete clinical records allowing retrospective evaluation

Exclusion criteria

* Restorations placed by clinicians outside the undergraduate or postgraduate trainee groups * Restorations performed using materials other than resin composite * Restorations placed on teeth other than posterior molars * Restorations with a follow-up duration shorter than 3 months * Incomplete or missing clinical records preventing standardized evaluation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Performance of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations Assessed by Modified USPHS-Ryge CriteriaUp to 24 monthsThe clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations was evaluated using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS-Ryge) criteria. Based on esthetic, functional, and biological parameters, restorations were categorized into two groups according to clinical acceptability: acceptable (+) and unacceptable (-).
Clinical Performance of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations Assessed by FDI World Dental Federation CriteriaUp to 24 monthsThe clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations was evaluated using the FDI World Dental Federation (Hickel) criteria, based on esthetic, functional, and biological parameters. Restorations were scored on a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 1 to 5, where scores of 1 and 2 were considered successful, score 3 clinically acceptable, and scores of 4 and 5 unsuccessful. Higher scores indicate worse clinical performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Clinical Performance Between Undergraduate and Postgraduate Operators Using USPHS CriteriaUp to 24 monthClinical performance outcomes assessed by the modified USPHS-Ryge criteria were compared between undergraduate dental students and postgraduate specialty trainees across follow-up periods.
Comparison of Clinical Performance Between Undergraduate and Postgraduate Operators Using FDI CriteriaUp to 24 monthClinical performance outcomes assessed by the FDI World Dental Federation criteria were compared between undergraduate dental students and postgraduate specialty trainees across follow-up periods.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026