Skip to content

Transanal vs Transvaginal Rectal Resection for Anterior Rectocele

Outcomes of Transanal Versus Transvaginal Rectal Resection for Anterior Rectocele: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07375147
Enrollment
62
Registered
2026-01-29
Start date
2025-06-14
Completion date
2027-01-01
Last updated
2026-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectocele; Female

Keywords

Rectocele, Obstructed defecation, Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection, Stapled Transvaginal Rectal Resection

Brief summary

Female patients presenting with obstructed defecation syndrome due to anterior rectocele will be screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible patients will undergo clinical assessment and appropriate investigations including defecography. After informed consent, patients will be randomized into two groups: Stapled Transanal rectal resection or Stapled Transvaginal rectal resection. Improvement in obstructed defecation symptoms and postoperative complications will be compared between the two groups.

Detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical outcomes of Stapled Transanal versus Stapled Transvaginal rectal resection in female patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) caused by anterior rectocele. Female patients presenting to the outpatient colorectal clinic with symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome will be screened for eligibility according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. All eligible patients will receive a detailed explanation of the study objectives, procedures, potential benefits, and risks. Written informed consent will be obtained prior to enrollment. A comprehensive preoperative evaluation will be performed for all participants, including detailed medical history, physical and anorectal examination, and appropriate investigations including defecography to confirm the diagnosis and assess the severity of rectocele. Enrolled patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into one of two intervention groups. Group A will undergo stapled Transanal rectal resection, while Group B will undergo stapled transvaginal rectal resection. All surgical procedures will be performed by experienced colorectal surgeons. Primary outcome measures will include improvement in obstructed defecation symptoms as assessed by Cleveland Clinic Constipation (CCC) score. Secondary outcomes will include length of hospital stay, operative time, postoperative pain score, postoperative continence state, Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) and postoperative complications.

Interventions

Patients were placed in the lithotomy position. Using the trans-anal approach, rectocele was done using PPH circular staplers. A circular anal dilator (CAD) was inserted into the anus and sutured into position. Three full-thickness prolene 2/0 sutures were positioned at the anterior, left anterior lateral, and right anterior lateral locations, approximately 4 cm above the dentate line. At the posterior aspect, a tongue depressor was placed into the CAD groove to protect the posterior rectal wall. After insertion of the Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids stapler (PPH stapler) into the rectum with its head open past the proximal suture, PPH stapler was progressively closed. Per vaginal examination was done To make sure the stapler did not include the vagina. The stapler was then fired to complete the anterior rectal resection.

PROCEDUREStapled Transvaginal Rectal Resection

The patient in the lithotomy position. Anal dilatation was performed. A transverse incision was made in the mucocutaneous border of the vaginal introitus; the posterior vaginal wall was dissected and separated from the anterior rectal wall up to the posterior fornix. Dissection was extended laterally to the maximum length of the rectocele. Two Babcock clamps were applied longitudinally to the rectocele, and the stapler was fired to divide the rectocele. Partial thickness stitches were applied over the staple line using vicryl 2/0 suture to reinforce the staple line.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult female patients complaining of obstructed defecation syndrome with anterior rectocele ≥ 3 cm on straining with failure of conservative management.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with Slow-transit constipation * Patients with rectocele of \< 3 cm on straining * Patients with complete external rectal prolapse * Evidence of colorectal carcinoma or Inflammatory bowel disease ( IBD) * Previous rectal surgeries * Inability for lifestyle change postoperatively * Previous surgeries for anterior rectocele

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in obstructed defecation symptoms in both groups using Cleveland Clinic Constipation (CCC) scoreUp to 6 months postoperativelyCompare Improvement in obstructed defecation symptoms in both groups using Cleveland Clinic Constipation (CCC) score. CCC score ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (more severe obstructed defecation symptoms )

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative timeDuring surgeryCompare time of operation between both procedure
Hospitalization periodFrom date of hospital admission until date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 10 days after surgeryCompare how many days patients stay in hospital in both groups
surgical site infectionUp to 6 months postoperativelycompare surgical site infection in both groups
Time for wound HealingUp to 6 months postoperativelyTime for wound Healing in both groups
Postoperative bleedingUp to 6 months postoperativelyCompare Postoperative bleeding in both groups
Postoperative fecal incontinenceUp to 6 months postoperativelyCompare post postoperative fecal incontinence in both groups
Postoperative urine retentionWithin 48 hours postoperativelyCompare postoperative urine retention in both groups
Pain intensityAt day 1 and day 7 postoperativelyCompare Pain intensity measured using Visual Analogue Scale between both groups (Visual Analogue Scale for Pain: ranges from 0 to 10 . Higher scores indicate a worse outcome {greater pain intensity})
Sexual Function in both groupsUp to 6 months postoperativelyCompare sexual function in both groups using Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ- 12). PISQ-12 score ranges from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate better sexual function
Postoperative anal stenosis in both groupsUp to 6 months postoperativelyPostoperative anal stenosis will be assessed by digital rectal examination and graded clinically as follows: * Mild: anal canal admits a well lubricated index finger. * Moderate: Forceful dilatation required to admit a well lubricated index finger. * Severe: Little finger cannot be admitted without forceful dilatation
Postoperative rectovaginal fistula in both groupsUp to 6 months postoperativelyPostoperative rectovaginal fistula will be assessed using the following methods: * History: Passage of flatus or stool from the vagina. * Clinical examination: Digital rectal examination and per vaginal examination to detect induration or fistula opening. * MRI of the pelvis: Performed if fistula is suspected based on history or clinical examination to confirm the diagnosis.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTAhmed Mohamed Abdelaal, Lecturer
drabdelaal90@gmail.com+201118732767
STUDY_DIRECTORMohamed Tamer, lecteurer

Cairo University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 23, 2026