Skip to content

Outcomes of Couples After Failed PGD Management: A Single-Center Study at the Paris PGD Center (Antoine Béclère - Necker)

Outcomes of Couples After Failed PGD Management: A Single-Center Study at the Paris PGD Center (Antoine Béclère - Necker)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07371312
Acronym
DECOPI
Enrollment
900
Registered
2026-01-27
Start date
2026-03-25
Completion date
2028-03-25
Last updated
2026-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Assisted Reproductive Technology, Infertility, Reproductive Outcomes, Live Birth, Pregnancy Outcome, Parental Project, Post-treatment Reproductive Pathways, Long-term Outcomes, Couples Reproductive Decisions

Brief summary

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a reproductive genetic technique aimed at preventing the transmission of severe genetic disorders. In France, its use is strictly regulated and reserved for complex medical situations, often associated with challenging reproductive histories and significant psychological burden. Despite scientific advances, success rates in preimplantation genetic testing remain limited, making the care pathway a significant source of uncertainty regarding the future of the parental project.

Detailed description

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a genetic diagnostic procedure performed on one or a few cells biopsied from embryos created through in vitro fertilization (IVF), prior to uterine transfer. The primary aim of PGT is to enable couples at confirmed risk of transmitting a genetic or chromosomal disorder considered to be of particular severity to have a child unaffected by the condition. By offering this possibility, PGT also represents an alternative to prenatal diagnosis (PND) and helps reduce the use of medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) when fetal abnormalities are detected. In France, PGT is strictly regulated by bioethics laws and the Public Health Code (Article L2131-4). It is authorized only on an exceptional basis, under conditions defined by legislation, for couples at risk of transmitting a serious genetic disorder recognized as incurable at the time of diagnosis (Agence de la biomédecine, 2023). This regulatory framework aims to ensure the ethical and controlled use of this technology. Introduced in France in 1999, PGT is currently performed in only five multidisciplinary centers authorized by the Agence de la biomédecine (ABM): Grenoble, Montpellier, Nantes, Paris, and Strasbourg. Indications for PGT are diverse and reflect a wide range of medical and familial contexts. They include histories of recurrent pregnancy loss, multiple medical terminations of pregnancy, the presence of a severe genetic disorder in one member of the couple or their offspring, as well as situations in which relatives have been diagnosed with a serious disease or disability, sometimes with late onset. These circumstances are often associated with complex psychological experiences, marked by repeated trauma and high levels of stress. In this context, psychological support is essential throughout the procedure to help couples manage uncertainty and potential treatment failure. Moreover, despite technological advances, success rates of PGT remain limited. Consequently, the assisted reproductive technology pathway involving PGT represents a major source of stress and may generate significant distress and uncertainty for couples. This process affects individuals on multiple levels: personal, relational, familial, and societal. A better understanding of these factors may allow clinical interventions to be adapted in order to more effectively support couples throughout their care pathway. When the PGT process does not result in the birth of a child, couples are faced with difficult decisions regarding the continuation of their parental project. Several options may then be considered: (i) attempting a natural pregnancy, with or without prenatal diagnosis; (ii) seeking PGT treatment abroad; (iii) considering gamete donation; or (iv) opting for adoption. In some cases, couples choose to discontinue their parental project altogether. Although these trajectories are individual, they are often influenced by medical, social, economic, and psychological factors.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Woman belonging to a couple who initiated at least one ovarian stimulation cycle for IVF (± ICSI) with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). * No further PGD-related procedures (oocyte retrieval or embryo transfer) performed in the center after December 31, 2022. * No live-born child resulting from PGD care. * Woman who expressed her free and informed non-opposition to participation.

Exclusion criteria

* One or more live-born children resulting from PGD care in the center. * PGD involving gamete donation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of couples with at least one live-born child surviving ≥3 years after failure of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)At least 3 years after the failure of PGD care (date of last PGD-related medical procedure in the center)Proportion of couples who achieved at least one pregnancy resulting in the birth of a live child who was alive at the age of 3 years or more, following failure of PGD care. PGD failure is defined as the absence of a live-born child resulting from PGD performed in the center. Outcome is assessed based on self-reported data collected via questionnaire, with verification when necessary.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reason for discontinuation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) careBaselineProportion of couples according to the reason for discontinuation of PGD care (medical decision vs couple's decision), assessed using a self-administered questionnaire.
Continuation of parental project after PGD failureBaselineProportion of couples who continued or discontinued their parental project after PGD failure, assessed using a self-administered questionnaire.
Post-PGD pathways followed after failure of PGD careFrom PGD failure to questionnaire completionDescription of pathways undertaken after PGD failure, including natural conception attempts, assisted reproductive technology without PGD, PGD in another center, adoption, or abandonment of the parental project, and their outcomes.
Occurrence of at least one pregnancy after PGD failureFrom PGD failure to questionnaire completionProportion of couples who achieved at least one pregnancy, whether evolutive or not, after failure of PGD care, regardless of the pathway followed.
Pregnancy occurring at least 3 years after PGD failureAt least 3 years after PGD failureOccurrence and date of onset of any pregnancy (evolutive or not) that occurred at least 3 years after the failure of PGD care.
Time to first pregnancy after PGD failureFrom PGD failure to date of first pregnancyTime interval between the date of the last PGD-related medical procedure performed in the center and the date of onset of the first pregnancy (evolutive or not) obtained after PGD failure.

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTCharlotte SONIGO, PhD
charlotte.sonigo@aphp.fr00 33 1 45 37 47 68
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCharlotte SONIGO, PhD

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 22, 2026