Skip to content

Comparative Study on the Short- and Long-term Efficacy of Q-ISR, Traditional Sub-ISR, and t-ISR

Comparative Study on the Short- and Long-term Efficacy of Q-ISR, Traditional Sub-ISR, and t-ISR

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07371273
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-01-27
Start date
2026-01-07
Completion date
2029-12-30
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Brief summary

This comparative study evaluates the short- and long-term outcomes of Quadrant-based Intersphincteric Resection (Q-ISR) versus traditional subtotal ISR (Sub-ISR) and conventional/total ISR (t-ISR) in patients with ultra-low rectal cancer undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery, with short-term endpoints focusing on perioperative safety (operative time, blood loss, length of stay, and postoperative complications such as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II, anastomotic leakage/stricture, and stoma reversal) and long-term endpoints assessing anorectal function recovery (LARS and Wexner scores after stoma closure) and oncologic efficacy (R0 resection, recurrence patterns, and survival outcomes), aiming to determine whether a quadrant-tailored resection strategy can better balance tumor control with anal function preservation.

Interventions

PROCEDUREQuadrant-based Intersphincteric Resection

Q-ISR (Quadrant-based ISR): Based on preoperative precise assessment and rectal endoscopic localization, selective resection of the internal sphincter is performed "by quadrant and quantificationally" according to the extent of lesion involvement, while striving to preserve the uninvolved quadrants and the external sphincter-levator ani complex. This aims to ensure R0 resection margins and oncological safety, while reducing the risk of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and accelerating the recovery of bowel control function.

Sponsors

Fudan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* (1) Rectal cancer diagnosed by digital rectal examination, colonoscopy, and combined biopsy pathology. (2) The distance from the lower edge of the tumor to the dentate line is 1.5-2.0 cm. (3) Good anal function before surgery. (4) The tumor does not infiltrate the intersphincteric space. (5) The tumor length is less than 3 cm, and the proportion of the tumor occupying the intestinal lumen is less than 1/3 of the circumference. (6) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score is ≤3.

Exclusion criteria

* (1) Presence of distant metastasis. (2) Undifferentiated carcinoma or mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Wexner score3years
LARS scores3years
disease-free survival5years

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTDawei Li
li_dawei@fudan.edu.cn+86-021-64175590

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026