Skip to content

mTLIP vs QIPB for Postoperative Analgesia After Lumbar Instrumentation Surgery

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block Versus Quadro-Iliac Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Lumbar Instrumentation Surgery

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07370415
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-01-27
Start date
2026-03-20
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2026-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

Lumbar instrumentation surgery, Postoperative Pain, Modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block, Quadro-iliac plane block

Brief summary

Lumbar instrumentation surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain due to extensive tissue dissection and prolonged muscle retraction during the procedure. Inadequate postoperative pain control may result in delayed mobilization, increased cardiopulmonary complications, and prolonged hospital stay. Ultrasound-guided regional analgesia techniques are increasingly used to improve postoperative pain management after lumbar spine surgery. The thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block has been shown to provide effective analgesia for lumbar instrumentation surgery, and its modified technique (mTLIP) has been reported to enhance postoperative pain control. The quadro-iliac plane (QIP) block is a newly described fascial plane block with promising results in lumbar spine surgery. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of the modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block and the quadro-iliac plane block in patients undergoing lumbar instrumentation surgery.

Detailed description

Lumbar instrumentation surgery is commonly associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain due to extensive tissue dissection and prolonged muscle retraction. Inadequate pain control may lead to delayed mobilization, increased cardiopulmonary complications, and prolonged hospital stay. Ultrasound-guided regional analgesia techniques, particularly fascial plane blocks, are increasingly used as part of multimodal analgesia in lumbar spine surgery. The thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block is an established technique that provides effective analgesia and has been modified to improve its clinical application, resulting in the modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane (mTLIP) block. Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of mTLIP for postoperative analgesia after lumbar instrumentation surgery. The quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) is a recently described ultrasound-guided fascial plane block. Early reports suggest that QIPB may provide effective analgesia in lumbar spine procedures; however, comparative evidence with established techniques remains limited. This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare bilateral ultrasound-guided mTLIP and QIPB performed at the end of surgery in patients undergoing elective lumbar instrumentation surgery under general anesthesia, to evaluate whether QIPB can be considered a safe and effective alternative to mTLIP for postoperative analgesia.

Interventions

An ultrasound-guided bilateral fascial plane block in which local anesthetic is injected into the interfascial plane between the longissimus and iliocostalis muscles at the operated lumbar levels. The block is performed under sterile conditions at the end of surgery using 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL per side; total volume 40 mL).

PROCEDUREQuadro-Iliac Plane Block (QIPB):

An ultrasound-guided bilateral fascial plane block in which local anesthetic is injected at the point where the quadratus lumborum muscle attaches to the iliac crest, allowing spread between the erector spinae and quadratus lumborum muscles. The block is performed under sterile conditions at the end of surgery using 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL per side; total volume 40 mL).

Sponsors

Bursa City Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 65 years * Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III * Scheduled for elective lumbar instrumentation surgery under general anesthesia * Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Use of anticoagulant medications or presence of bleeding diathesis * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or opioid drugs * Infection at the planned block site * Alcohol or drug dependence * Cognitive impairment preventing reliable pain assessment * Pregnancy or lactation * History of previous lumbar spine surgery * Diabetes mellitus * Renal or hepatic insufficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative 48-Hour PCA Opioid ConsumptionPostoperative 0-8, 8-16, 16-24, 24-48 intervalsTotal amount of opioid delivered by the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device during the first 48 hours after surgery, recorded in milligrams (mg).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
QoR-15 Recovery ScorePostoperative 24th and 48th hoursThe investigators will use the Turkish version of Quality of Recovery (QoR) / QoR-15 questionairre PART A How have you been feeling in the last 24 hours? (0 to 10, where: 0 = none of the time \[poor\] and 10 = all of the time \[excellent\]) Able to breathe easily Been able to enjoy food Feeling rested Have had a good sleep Able to look after personal toilet and hygiene unaided Able to communicate with Getting support from hospital doctors and nurses Able to return to work or usual home activities Feeling comfortable and in control Having a feeling of general well-being PART B Have you had any of the following in the last 24 hours? (10 to 0, where: 10 = none of the time \[excellent\] and 0 = all of the time \[poor\]) Moderate pain Severe pain Nausea or vomiting Feeling worried or anxious Feeling sad or depressed
Dynamic and static Numeric Rating Scale scores0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours postoperativelyNumeric Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10; 0= no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt) pain scores at rest or movement at predefined postoperative hours
Total rescue analgesic dosePostoperative 48 hoursDespite the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), if the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score is ≥4 at any time point, 0.5 mg/kg intravenous meperidine will be administered as rescue analgesia. Total amount of meperidin during the first 24 and 48 hours after surgery, recorded in milligrams (mg).
Time of first request for rescue analgesiaPostoperative 48 hoursDespite the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), if the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score is ≥4 at any time point, 0.5 mg/kg intravenous meperidine will be administered as rescue analgesia.
Length of Hospital StayPatients will remain under observation for at least 2 weeks until their postoperative discharge. Follow-up will be completed upon discharge. The length of hospital stay will be recorded.Length of hospital stay will be defined as the number of days from the end of surgery to hospital discharge
Block and Opioid-Related Adverse Effects and ComplicationsPostoperative 48 hoursBlock- and opioid-related adverse effects and complications, including but not limited to local anesthetic toxicity, hematoma, infection, nerve injury, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation, and respiratory depression, will be recorded

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTMerih Yildiz Eglen, MD
meriheg@yahoo.com+905059340629
CONTACTMursel Ekinci, Assoc prof MD
drmurselekinci@gmail.com+905067137596

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026