Skip to content

Spot Analysis of Natriuresis to Guide up- or Down-titration of Diuretic Therapy in Ambulatory Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Spot Analysis of Natriuresis to Guide up- or Down-titration of Diuretic Therapy in Ambulatory Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (SAND-HF)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07369856
Acronym
SAND-HF
Enrollment
300
Registered
2026-01-27
Start date
2025-11-04
Completion date
2027-12-30
Last updated
2026-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diuretics, Heart Failure

Keywords

heart failure, diuretics, management

Brief summary

Heart failure is a chronic condition that causes congestion and frequent hospitalizations. Diuretic doses are usually adjusted based on clinical judgment without an objective measure of response. This study will test the feasibility of using point-of-care urine sodium measurements to guide up-titration or down-titration of loop diuretics in ambulatory patients with heart failure. Participants will be assigned to one of three groups based on congestion status. Groups 1 and 2 will be randomized 1:1 to natriuresis-guided therapy or standard care. Group 3 will be observational. The 90-day pilot trial will evaluate feasibility, clinical outcomes, and usability of a urine sodium-guided titration strategy.

Detailed description

Heart failure is commonly associated with sodium retention and congestion. Loop diuretics are used to relieve congestion but are typically adjusted based on symptoms and clinical judgment. Spot urine sodium concentration is an objective measure of diuretic response that may help personalize treatment. A point-of-care urine sodium sensor provides rapid results and may support effective decongestion or safe reduction of diuretics when appropriate. This prospective, two-center pilot study includes three clinical groups: Group 1: Up-titration cohort Patients with clinical congestion or objective evidence of congestion. These participants will be randomized 1:1 to natriuresis-guided up-titration or standard care. Group 2: Down-titration cohort Stable, euvolemic patients who may safely reduce diuretic therapy. These participants will be randomized 1:1 to natriuresis-guided down-titration or standard care. Group 3: Observational cohort The first 100 screened patients who do not meet criteria for Groups 1 or 2. These participants will undergo baseline assessments and routine follow-up without intervention. Urine sodium will be measured at baseline and follow-up visits. Randomized participants will have diuretic doses adjusted based on predefined algorithms. Standard care participants will receive usual clinical management. The primary aim is to assess feasibility, including recruitment, retention, adherence to sampling procedures, and workflow implementation. Secondary analyses will describe clinical, laboratory, and symptom-based outcomes to inform development of a larger definitive trial.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNatriuresis-Guided Up-Titration

Diuretic dose and regimen will be increased based on post-diuretic urine sodium concentration measured by a point-of-care sensor. Insufficient natriuresis (\<80 mmol/L) will prompt dose escalation using a predefined algorithm.

OTHERStandard care

Participants will receive usual clinical management of loop diuretics at the discretion of the treating physician, without natriuresis-guided adjustment.

BEHAVIORALNatriuresis-Guided Down-Titration

Loop diuretic doses will be reduced based on urine sodium levels. If urine sodium ≥80 mmol/L, the current dose will be maintained; if \<80 mmol/L, dose will be reduced according to a predefined algorithm. Re-titration criteria include symptomatic weight gain \>2 kg in one week.

Participants who do not meet inclusion criteria for Groups 1 or 2 will undergo baseline urine sodium assessment and routine clinical follow-up. No study-directed titration will occur.

Sponsors

Cardiology Research UBC
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Diagnosis of heart failure according to the Universal Definition * Use of loop diuretics * Residing in VCH or PHC regions Group-specific inclusion: Group 1: Congestion score ≥5 OR objective congestion; stable furosemide ≥1 week Group 2: NYHA I-II; congestion score \<5; no recent HF hospitalization; stable furosemide ≥1 month Group 3: First 100 eligible patients not meeting criteria for Groups 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

* eGFR \<20 mL/min/1.73m² * Renal replacement therapy * High-risk clinical status requiring hospitalization * Inability to consent or perform required urine sampling

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Clinical Congestion Score (Group 1)90 DaysChange in clinical congestion score among Group 1 participants. Minimum Value: 1 Maximum Value: 22 A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Successful Down-Titration of Loop Diuretics (Group 2)90 DaysProportion of Group 2 participants who maintain a reduced loop diuretic dose without needing up-titration during follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dyspnea Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Area Under the Curve90 DaysChange in dyspnea over time measured using serial VAS assessments.
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) Score90 DaysChange in heart-failure related quality of life using the KCCQ-12. 12-item version. Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 100 Outcome Meaning: A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Change in New York Heart Association Functional (NYHA) Functional ClassificationBaseline, 30 days, 90 daysChange in New York Heart Association functional classification. Minimum Value: 1 Maximum Value: 4 Outcome Meaning: A higher class indicates a worse outcome.
Signs of Volume OverloadProportion of participants with clinical signs of volume overload.90 Days
Change in Body Weight90 DaysChange in Body weight
Loop Diuretic Use and DoseBaseline, 30 days, 90 daysLoop Diuretic Use and Dose at different timepoints
Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Use90 daysGuideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Use
NT-proBNP Concentration90 daysNT-proBNP Concentration changes
Hemoconcentration90 daysChanges in hemoglobin and hematocrit.
Change in Creatinine and BUN90 daysChange in Creatinine and BUN
Worsening Renal Function90 daysCreatinine increase ≥100% from baseline.
Hypokalemia90 DaysFrequency of potassium \<3.5 mEq/L.
Urine Sodium ≥80 mmol/L (Group 1)90 DaysProportion of follow-up urine samples ≥80 mmol/L.
Point-of-Care vs Laboratory Sodium Measurement AgreementBaseline to 90 daysCorrelation between point-of-care and laboratory urine sodium measurements.
System Usability Scale90 DaysUsability of the natriuresis-guided process. Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 100 Outcome Meaning: A higher score indicates a better outcome.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTNatalie Bloch, MD
natalie.blochisenberg@vch.ca604-875-4111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026