Skip to content

Magnetic Tracking and ECG-Guided Tip Confirmation System for PICCs

Magnetic Tracking and Electrocardiography-Guided Tip Confirmation System for Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07369427
Enrollment
176
Registered
2026-01-27
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2026-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters

Brief summary

This prospective study enrolled cancer patients who underwent peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement at a tertiary care oncology hospital in Guangzhou between January 1st and May 30th, 2026. Data on catheterization outcomes and complications were collected to compare two tip positioning techniques: electromagnetic navigation tip positioning and traditional electrocardiogram (ECG)-guided positioning. The outcomes assessed included first-attempt catheterization success rate, tip positioning accuracy, catheterization procedure time, post-procedural catheter adjustment time, and the incidence of complications (thrombosis, infection, and catheter dysfunction) within 4 weeks post-catheterization.

Interventions

OTHERSherlock 3CG Tip Confirmation System

Sherlock 3CG Tip Confirmation System: An integrated system combining magnetic navigation tracking and ECG guidance. It dynamically confirms the tip's position relative to the target anatomical location (e.g., superior vena cava-right atrial junction) by real-time tracking of the catheter tip's spatial position via magnetic navigation and synchronously monitoring ECG signals (e.g., P-wave changes). Traditional ECG-Guided Tip Positioning Technology: Relying solely on ECG monitoring for guidance, it assists in determining the tip position via characteristic waveform changes in intracardiac ECG signals (e.g., changes in P-wave amplitude) derived from the catheter tip electrode as the tip approaches the target location, serving as a conventional positioning method.

Sponsors

Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* cancer patients receiving PICC placement * High risk of PICC-related thrombosis(Evaluated by Caprini score ≥ 5) * Agree to receive PICC maintenance at the research hospital; * Sign the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* PICC placed in the lower limb * Estimated survival time less than one month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
one time catheterization ratedata will be collected on Day 1

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
time for catheter tip positioning during catheterizationon Day 1
time for catheter tip adjustment after catheterizationon Day 1
rate of correct catheter tip positioningon Day 1
rate of PICC-related complicationswithin 4 weeks after catheterization

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTZeyin Hu, Master
huzy@sysucc.org.cn+8615899954190

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 8, 2026