Skip to content

Erector Spinae Plane Block in Kidney Transplant Pain Management

Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain After Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Study"

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07369323
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-01-27
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
2025-05-01
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Failure

Keywords

renal transplantation, erector spine plane block, pain management

Brief summary

Use of postoperative analgesia in kidney transplant recipients has always been challenging due to several issues: potential nephrotoxicity of nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory drugs and the reduced clearance of morphine metabolites due to transient renal impairment.Moreover, many patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis are hepatitis C or hepatitis B virus positive, and the use of other effective analgesics, such as acetaminophen, is limited.The use of regional analgesia methods for postoperative analgesia can also be a useful option for more adequate control in these patients. Currently, methods of fascial trunk nerve blocks (including rectus sheath block, different types of transversus abdominis plane block, and erector spinae plane \[ESP\] block) have been shown to be effective components of multimodal anesthesia in various fields of surgery.In this study, investigators evaluated the effectiveness of ESP block in the postoperative period after kidney transplant.The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effects of erector spinae plane block on postoperative analgesia quality, opioid consumption, and side effect profile in kidney transplant patients.The study included a total of 40 patients aged 18-65 years with ASA physical status II-III who were scheduled for elective kidney transplantation. All patients received standard general anesthesia. Anesthesia induction was achieved with propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg), fentanyl (1-2 µg/kg), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). Anesthesia maintenance was provided with 6% desflurane and a 50% oxygen-air mixture.ESPB Group: USG-guided unilateral ESP block at T9 level (0.25% bupivacaine 20 ml) * Control Group: no block applied * All patients received standard postoperative analgesia protocol. Intravenous paracetamol (1 g/8 hours) was given. Intravenous tramadol (100 mg) was administered as rescue analgesic when VAS ≥ 4.

Interventions

OTHERESP block

USG-guided unilateral ESP block at T9 level (0.25% bupivacaine 20 ml)

Sponsors

Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients had end-stage renal disease due to chronic glomerulonephritis \_ physical status of class 3 on American Society of Anesthesiologists classification.

Exclusion criteria

* ASA 4

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperrative VAS scores at 24 hourspostoperative 24 hoursPostoperative Vas scores at 15 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026