Skip to content

Assessing the Effectiveness of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) With Personalized Feedback Intervention to Reduce Polysubstance Impaired Driving in Young Adults Aged 18-30

Assessing the Effectiveness of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) With Personalized Feedback Intervention to Reduce Polysubstance Impaired Driving in Young Adults Aged 18-30

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07368894
Acronym
ADAPT
Enrollment
600
Registered
2026-01-27
Start date
2026-01-31
Completion date
2028-09-01
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impaired Driving

Brief summary

The current study is assessing the effects of receiving Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment alone versus also receiving a brief online personalized intervention on impaired driving behaviors among Washington State young adults aged 18-30.

Detailed description

The current project is inviting young adult aged 18-30 in Washington State who screen at moderate or moderate to high risk or who report impaired driving during Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment. Consented young adults would be randomized to receive a brief online personalized intervention or waitlist control and be assessed at enrollment and 3 months later. A selection of participants will be assessed at 6 months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPersonalize Feedback Intervention

The brief online personalized feedback intervention (PFI) is adapted from the personalized feedback provided in BASICS, iCHAMP, studies using similar standalone PFI approaches. Specifically, feedback adapted from these brief motivational interventions and prior projects include: Patterns of use: alcohol, cannabis, other drug, and polysubstance use frequency, alcohol and cannabis quantity and peak; Substance use norms; Expectancies of use of alcohol ; Estimates on money the participant spends on alcohol and cannabis compared; Protective behavioral strategies; Alcohol- and/or cannabis-impaired driving norms; Wait time to drive and related psychoeducation; Additional psychoeducation is provided (e.g., standard drink; information on tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) percentages) throughout the feedback to improve understanding and motivation for change.

Sponsors

University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All participants will receive the brief online intervention. Half will be randomized to receive it immediately after baseline, the other half will receive it 3 months after baseline.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18-30 at enrollment * Received Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in the past 3 month * Through SBIRT screened at moderate or moderate-to-high risk based on substance use OR reported any impaired driving the past 6 months * Lives in Washington State * Received a study information card from an SBIRT provider * Consents to having Zip Code use for analyses * Consents to randomization to receive brief online personalized intervention or waitlist control

Exclusion criteria

* Not meeting eligibility criteria * Inability to confirm participant's identity, residency, or date received SBIRT.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by both alcohol and cannabis at 3 month follow-upFrom baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow up assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by both alcohol and cannabis at 6 month follow-upFrom 3 month after completing baseline to 3 months later at the 6 month follow-up assessment
Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by cannabis only at 3 month follow-upFrom baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow-up assessment
Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by alcohol only at 6 month follow-upFrom 3 months after baseline to 3 months later at 6 month follow-up assessment
Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by cannabis only at 6 month follow-upFrom 3 months after baseline to 3 months later at 6 month follow-up assessment
Reported wait time to drive after using both alcohol and cannabis measured in minutes at 3 month follow upFrom baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow up assessment.Question asks: How long do you typically wait to drive after using alcohol and Cannabis used at the same time so that the effects overlap. Participants answer in hours and minutes which is transformed into total number of minutes.
Reported wait time to drive after using alcohol measured in minutes at 3 month follow upFrom baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow up assessment.Question asks: How long do you typically wait to drive after using alcohol. Participants answer in hours and minutes which is transformed into total number of minutes.
Reported wait time to drive after using cannabis measured in minutes at 3 month follow upFrom baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow up assessment.Question asks: How long do you typically wait to drive after using cannabis. Participants answer in hours and minutes which is transformed into total number of minutes.
Reported wait time to drive after using both alcohol and cannabis measured in minutes at 6 month follow upFrom 3 months after baseline to 3 months later at 6 month follow-up assessmentQuestion asks: How long do you typically wait to drive after using alcohol and Cannabis used at the same time so that the effects overlap. Participants answer in hours and minutes which is transformed into total number of minutes.
Reported wait time to drive after using alcohol measured in minutes at 6 month follow upFrom 3 months after baseline to 3 months later at 6 month follow-up assessmentQuestion asks: How long do you typically wait to drive after using alcohol . Participants answer in hours and minutes which is transformed into total number of minutes.
Number of times in the past 3 months participants drove impaired by alcohol only at 3 month follow-upFrom baseline to 3 months later at 3 month follow-up assessment
Reported wait time to drive after using cannabis measured in minutes at 6 month follow upFrom 3 months after baseline to 3 months later at 6 month follow-up assessmentQuestion asks: How long do you typically wait to drive after using cannabis. Participants answer in hours and minutes which is transformed into total number of minutes.

Contacts

CONTACTBrittney Hultgren, PhD
hultgren@uw.edu206-221-4657
CONTACTAri Lisitza, MS
adapt-wa@uw.edu206-685-0903

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026