Skip to content

Video-Based Versus Simulation-Based Basic Life Support Training in Medical Students

Video-Based Versus Simulation-Based Basic Life Support Training in Medical Students: A Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07368452
Acronym
BLS-VIDEO-SIM
Enrollment
121
Registered
2026-01-26
Start date
2025-10-04
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2026-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Basic Life Support (BLS) Training, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), Medical Education

Keywords

basic life support, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, simulation-based education, video-based education, OSCE

Brief summary

This randomized educational trial compared a structured video-based Basic Life Support (BLS) training program with simulation-based BLS training among fourth-year medical students. Participants were allocated to one of the two training formats and completed a BLS knowledge test before and immediately after training. Performance was assessed using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) conducted 3 weeks after training. The primary outcome was OSCE performance at 3 weeks, and secondary outcomes included knowledge test scores and knowledge gain.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALVideo-based BLS training

A structured video-based Basic Life Support (BLS) training module covering adult CPR and AED use, delivered via standardized instructional videos.

BEHAVIORALSimulation-based BLS training

Instructor-led simulation-based Basic Life Support (BLS) training using manikins and scenario-based practice focused on adult CPR and AED use.

Sponsors

Kutahya Health Sciences University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Masking Description: Not applicable.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomized to one of two parallel arms (video-based vs simulation-based BLS training) and received only the assigned intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Enrollment as a fourth-year medical student at the study institution * Age 18 years or older * Willingness to participate in the study * Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Previous participation in a formal BLS instructor or trainer program * Declined or withdrew informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
OSCE performance score3 weeks after trainingTotal score obtained on a standardized Basic Life Support (BLS) Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) checklist. Higher scores indicate better performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BLS knowledge test score (pre-test)Baseline (before training)Score obtained on a multiple-choice BLS knowledge test administered before training.
BLS knowledge test score (post-test)Immediately after trainingScore obtained on the same multiple-choice BLS knowledge test administered immediately after training.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026