Skip to content

Predictors of Success After Intercostal Nerve Radiofrequency Treatment for Intercostal Neuralgia

Predictors of Treatment Success After Intercostal Nerve Radiofrequency for Intercostal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07367152
Acronym
ICN-RF-IN
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-01-26
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2026-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intercostal Neuralgia, Postherpetic Neuralgia ( PHN ), Thoracic Neuropathic Pain

Keywords

Intercostal nerve, Pulsed radiofrequency, Conventional radiofrequency, Ultrasound-guided

Brief summary

This retrospective cohort study will review medical records of patients treated with intercostal nerve radiofrequency for intercostal neuralgia. The goal is to identify patient and clinical factors that are associated with treatment success after the procedure. Outcomes will be assessed using pain measures documented during routine follow-up visits, along with any recorded adverse events. No additional visits, tests, or interventions are required because this study uses previously collected clinical data.

Detailed description

This retrospective cohort study analyzed anonymized medical records of adults (≥18 years) with intercostal neuralgia (post-traumatic, postherpetic, or idiopathic) treated in Pain Clinic of Mersin University Faculty of Medicine who underwent ultrasound-guided intercostal conventional radiofrequency ablation (CRF) or pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) between January 1, 2018 and May 30, 2025. Primary outcome is treatment response at 6 months, defined by IMMPACT criteria as a ≥50% reduction or ≥4-point decrease in NRS-11 from baseline; secondary outcomes include changes in NRS-11 over time, and exploratory analyses evaluate whether clinical factors (e.g., age, sex, pain duration, diagnosis, presence of allodynia, and number of treated intercostal levels )are associated with response using multivariable logistic regression (p \< 0.05 considered statistically significant). The findings are expected to clarify which patient and clinical characteristics are linked to better outcomes after intercostal nerve radiofrequency and to support more individualized decision-making in the management of intercostal neuralgia.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIntercostal Nerve Conventional Radiofrequency Ablation (CRF)

Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve lesioning at 80°C for 90 seconds following sensory stimulation.

PROCEDUREIntercostal Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF)

Ultrasound-guided intercostal pulsed radiofrequency delivered at 42°C for 240 seconds.

Sponsors

Mersin University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years. * Diagnosis of intercostal neuralgia (post-traumatic, postherpetic, or idiopathic) with thoracic neuropathic pain for at least 1 month * Underwent ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve radiofrequency treatment (conventional radiofrequency ablation \[CRF\] or pulsed radiofrequency \[PRF\]) as part of routine clinical care * Documented baseline NRS-11 pain score prior to the procedure and follow-up NRS-11 data available through at least 6 months after treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Thoracic pain attributable to malignancy-related causes (e.g., active malignant invasion, spinal metastasis) or an intrathoracic mass * History of thoracic surgery at the corresponding thoracic dermatome level (e.g., thoracotomy or VATS) * Prior radiofrequency treatment at the same intercostal nerve site * Receipt of other interventional treatments targeting the intercostal nerve during the study period (e.g., cryoablation or chemical neurolysis) * Insufficient follow-up data (less than 6 months of follow-up NRS-11 documentation).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment response at 6 months (IMMPACT-defined responder rate)6 monthsResponder defined as ≥50% reduction or ≥4-point decrease in NRS-11 compared with baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in NRS-11 pain score from baselineBaseline, 3 months, and 6 monthsNRS-11 ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026