Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of the RDI Mode in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Efficacy and Safety of the RDI Mode in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07366489
Acronym
RM-ESD
Enrollment
158
Registered
2026-01-26
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)

Keywords

ESD, RDI, early cancer, polyp

Brief summary

Conventional white-light endoscopy (WLE) is hampered by insufficient contrast when attempting to identify deep vessels and active bleeding sites; visibility drops further when blood pools or spurts obscure the field, resulting in significantly lower hemostatic efficiency. Red dichromatic imaging (RDI), a novel image-enhanced endoscopic modality, has recently been shown to improve the visualization of deep-lying vessels and bleeding points, shorten hemostasis time and potentially increase overall procedural efficiency. Although retrospective series have suggested that RDI may facilitate intra-operative bleeding control and better delineation of the submucosal plane during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), high-level evidence from multicenter, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) is lacking. No study has yet demonstrated superiority over WLE with respect to critical endpoints such as en-bloc resection rate, procedure time, complication rate and operator mental workload. The investigators therefore designed a multicenter RCT to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of full-procedural RDI with conventional WLE during ESD. The primary outcome parameter is the mean resection speed (mm²/min) achieved with RDI versus conventional white-light endoscopy during ESD. The secondary outcome parameters are: complete resection (R0) rate, en-bloc resection rate, resection margin, number of intra-procedural bleeding episodes, intra-procedural blood loss, intra-procedural hemostasis time, other intra-procedural adverse events, and post-procedural adverse events.

Interventions

OTHERRDI

Throughout the entire ESD dissection, the RDI mode is used continuously for submucosal dissection (while white-light endoscopy may be employed for observation and marking).

Sponsors

Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years. * Early gastric cancer or precancerous lesions, early esophageal cancer or precancerous lesions, or early colorectal cancer/polyps that meet ESD indications. * ESD procedure to be performed at a participating center. * Lesion diameter 20-60 mm. ⑤ Written informed consent provided voluntarily.

Exclusion criteria

① Foreigners. ② Severe coagulopathy (platelet count \<50×10⁹/L or INR \>1.5), significant cardiopulmonary disease, or any other contraindication to endoscopic therapy. ③ Imaging evidence of distant metastasis or lymph-node metastasis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mean resection speed (mm²/min) achieved with RDI versus conventional WLE during ESDPeriproceduralThe resection speed is calculated as the area on the specimen-fixation board divided by the time elapsed from the first mucosal incision to complete dissection of the lesion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
en-bloc resection ratePeriproceduralen-bloc resection rate
resection marginPeriproceduralvertical and horizontal resection margin
number of intra-procedural bleeding episodesPeriproceduralnumber of intra-procedural bleeding episodes
intra-procedural blood lossPeriproceduralintra-procedural blood loss
intra-procedural hemostasis timePeriproceduralintra-procedural hemostasis time
other intra-procedural adverse eventsPeriproceduralperforation, infection, and other adverse eventes
complete resection (R0) ratePeriproceduralcomplete resection (R0) rate
post-procedural adverse eventsFrom enrollment to 30 days after the procedure.perforation, infection, delayed gastrointestinal bleeding, and other adverse events,

Contacts

CONTACTJia C Sun, MM
sunjch8@mail.sysu.edu.cn86-20-38379764

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026