Class II Malocclusion
Conditions
Keywords
Class II malocclusion, Carriere motion appliance, Distalization
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of custom-made CMA vs. the ready-made CMA.
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of custom-made CMA from brackets, buccal tubes, stiff wire, and NiTi coil springs and compare it with the ready-made CMA.
Interventions
custom-made CMA from brackets, buccal tubes, stiff wire, and NiTi coil springs to treat class II malocclusion by molar distalization.
Ready-made Carriere motion appliance to treat class II malocclusion by molar distalization.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients age (12-15) years. * Full permanent dentition. * Class II malocclusion with at least an end-on Class II molar relationship bilaterally.
Exclusion criteria
* Systemic conditions that may interfere with the treatment. * Bad habits that might jeopardize the appliance. * Transverse discrepancy. * Previous orthodontic treatment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment duration | up to 6 months from the start of treatment until the date of first documented progression | in about 6 months from the start of treatment till reaching class I molar relation |
| Skeletal and dental changes | up to 6 months from the start of treatment until the date of first documented progression | angular and linear cephalometric measurements |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Soft tissue changes | up to 6 months from the start of treatment until the date of first documented progression | angular and linear cephalometric measurements |
| Patient satisfaction | up to 6 months from the start of treatment until the date of first documented progression | patient questionnaire about oral health related quality of life: their satisfaction and discomfort |
Countries
Egypt