Skip to content

Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes With Palatal Plate Versus Conventional Tooth Borne Anchorage in Class III Patients

Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes With Palatal Plate Versus Conventional Tooth Borne Anchorage in Class III Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07360509
Enrollment
14
Registered
2026-01-22
Start date
2023-08-15
Completion date
2025-11-11
Last updated
2026-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

Brief summary

evaluation of treatment outcomes with palatal plate versus conventional tooth borne anchorage in class III patients

Detailed description

group (A) patients were treated with transpalatal arch and facemask. group(B) patients were treated by palatal plate and facemask

Interventions

DEVICEtreatment of skeletal class III by maxillary advancement using transpalatal arch and face mask

TPA group

DEVICEtreatment of skeletal class III by maxillary advancement using palatal plate and face mask

palatal plate group

Sponsors

Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* skeletal class III malocclusion deficient maxilla+ growing patient

Exclusion criteria

* adult patient, cleft patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
skeletal and dental maxillary changes including SN angle, SNB angle, ANB angle3-12 monthslateral cephalometry

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026