Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
Conditions
Keywords
dupilumab, budesonide oral suspension, Eohilia, Dupixent
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare Eosinophilic Esophagitis treatments Eohilia with Dupixent in their effects on diameter and scarring of the esophagus.
Detailed description
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease mediated by environmental allergens and type 2 immune inflammation which causes significant symptoms, food impactions, and stenosis. EoE is associated with significant esophageal stricturing disease. In particular, the odds of developing fibrostenotic disease in EoE more than double per decade of life, and the longer symptoms are present prior to diagnosis and treatment, the higher the likelihood of esophageal strictures being present. Dupilumab and budesonide oral suspension are key treatments for EoE. Dupilumab was FDA approved for EoE in 2022 and inhibits IL-4 and IL-13 signaling which mediate type-2 inflammation and may have an anti-fibrotic effect. IL-13 promotes M2 macrophage polarization, and a recent study showed fibrosis was macrophage-dependent in a mouse model of EoE. Swallowed topical steroids have been used off label in patients with EoE for several years with studies showing effects on improvement in esophageal diameter and reduction in esophageal strictures. The budesonide oral suspension was recently FDA approved in 2024. Further study is needed to understand the effect of these treatments on esophageal stenosis and fibrosis as no clinical trials have compared these treatments or their effects on esophageal diameter to date. Barium esophagram and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) are important tools used to measure esophageal diameter in EoE. The investigators hypothesize that dupilumab is superior to topical budesonide oral suspension for its effect on esophagram minimum diameter and FLIP distensibility plateau in EoE patients. • Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Alternative Hypothesis: There will be a greater increase in minimum esophageal diameter in patients receiving dupilumab compared to budesonide oral suspension at 12 weeks. • Secondary Efficacy Endpoint(s): Alternative Hypothesis: There will be greater distensibility on EndoFLIP topography in patients receiving dupilumab compared to budesonide oral suspension at 12 weeks. Symptoms, endoscopic findings, and histologic severity will be improved in patients receiving dupilumab compared to budesonide oral suspension at 12 weeks. Lamina propria fibrosis and collagen fiber density as determined by second harmonic generation microscopy will be improved in the dupilumab group in comparison to the budesonide oral suspension group.
Interventions
300 mg weekly injection
2mg twice daily
Sponsors
Mayo Clinic
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form 2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 3. Male or female, aged ≥18 year of age at Mayo Clinic Rochester or Mayo Clinic Scottsdale at time of informed consent 4. Have a documented diagnosis of EoE per standard guidelines 5. Have histologically active EoE (defined as a peak eosinophil count \>15 eosinophils per high-power field; eos/hpf) 6. Weight ≥40 kg 7. Ability to take injectable or oral medication and be willing to adhere to the study intervention regimen 8. For females of reproductive potential: use of highly effective contraception for at least 1 month prior to screening and agreement to use such a method during study participation and for an additional 12 weeks after the end of dupilumab or budesonide suspension administration. Willingness to complete pregnancy tests during study visits and at end of study. 9. For males of reproductive potential: use of condoms or other methods to ensure effective contraception with partner 10. Subject agrees to maintain a stable diet 11. Subject is willing to receive weekly injections throughout the study 12. Subject is willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
Exclusion criteria
1. Inability to provide informed consent 2. Pregnancy or lactation 3. Contraindication to performing upper endoscopy 4. Known allergic reactions to components of dupilumab or budesonide suspension 5. Non-EoE eosinophilic GI diseases (EGIDs) or hypereosinophilic disorders 6. Prior esophageal surgery, coagulopathy or esophageal varices 7. Known achalasia, crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease 8. Child-Pugh Class C liver disease 9. Failed dupilumab 10. Failed swallowed topical budesonide 11. Erosive esophagitis LA B and above found during EGD 12. Use of prednisone within 2 months prior to study enrollment 13. Treatment with biologic therapies for other disease indications 14. Treatment with medium or high potency topical steroids for skin conditions 15. Autoimmune conditions including lupus, rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis 16. Participant not suitable for participation, whatever the reason, as judged by the Investigator, including medical or clinical conditions, or participants potentially at risk of noncompliance to study procedures
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Esophageal diameter | from enrollment until up to 14 weeks | the minimum esophageal diameter after 12 weeks of treatment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Distensibility and diameter change | from baseline to end of treatment at 14 weeks | Secondary outcomes will include distensibility and change in minimum diameter as measured by endoFLIP topography |
| EEsAI questionnaire scores | from enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks | comparison of questionnaires that are scored 0-100 before and after treatment. |
| Endoscopic refernece score (EREFS) | from enrollment up to end of treatment at 12 weeks | comparison of EREFs scores on scale of 0-9 at EGDs |
| Eosinophil counts | from enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks | number of eosinophils found in biopsy during EGD |
| Eoe Histologic Scoring system (EoEHSS) | from enrollment to end of treatment at 12 weeks | An EoEHSS score is given by looking at a biopsy taken during an endoscopy. The score is based on observation of the appearance of the biopsy under a microscope. Score range is 0 to 1 |
| M2 macrophage polarization | from enrollment to end of treatment at 12 weeks | comparison of myofibroblast differentiation |
| Lamina propria remodeling | from enrollment to end of treatment at week 12 | characterizing Lamina propria remodeling by second harmonic imaging microscopy |
Countries
United States
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDiana Snyder, M.D.
Mayo Clinic
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJennifer Horsley-Silva, M.D.
Mayo Clinic
Outcome results
None listed