Skip to content

Effect of Different Root Canal Disinfection Procedures on Postoperative Pain

Effect of Different Root Canal Disinfection Procedures on Postoperative Pain: A One-Week Follow-Up Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07355816
Acronym
EDRCD-PP
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-01-21
Start date
2023-06-13
Completion date
2024-11-11
Last updated
2026-01-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

Root Canal Therapy,Disinfection Methods

Brief summary

This clinical study evaluated the effects of different root canal disinfection procedures on postoperative pain. Patients requiring root canal treatment received one of several disinfection methods. Postoperative pain was assessed at 6,24, 48, 72 hours and on the 7th day using a standard pain scale. The aim of the study was to identify which method resulted in the least discomfort. Participation involved a single treatment session and short-term follow-up for pain measurement.

Interventions

Root canals will be irrigated using a conventional syringe and needle technique with standard irrigant solutions. This method relies solely on manual delivery without activation devices.

Root canals will be irrigated using passive ultrasonic activation, which uses ultrasonic energy to improve irrigant effectiveness and reduce microbial load beyond manual techniques.

Root canals will be irrigated using a sonic activation device (e.g., EndoActivator) to enhance irrigant penetration and bacterial elimination compared to conventional irrigation.

PROCEDUREKTP Laser Disinfection

Root canals will be disinfected using a KTP laser following standard irrigation protocols. Laser application aims to provide enhanced antimicrobial effects not achievable with conventional or activated irrigation methods.

Sponsors

Cumhuriyet University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Systemically healthy individuals between the ages of 18 and 65, * Adequate mouth opening, * Asymptomatic devitaled mandibular premolar with a single root and single canal, * Negative response to cold and electric pulp tests and no bleeding at the pulp chamber opening, * Able to provide rubber dam isolation, * Presence of opposing teeth.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of mental or psychiatric disorders, * Allergic diseases, * Use of painkillers within 12 hours or antibiotics within 1 week before the procedure, * Swelling, palpation/percussion pain, or sinus tract before treatment, * Presence of a periodontal pocket greater than 3 mm in diameter on the involved tooth, * Presence of a periapical radiolucency greater than 5 mm in diameter associated with the involved tooth, * Initiation of root canal treatment, * Irreparable material loss, root fracture, or crack, * Severe mobility, * Open apex, * Severe root canal calcification, * Internal or external resorption, * Bruxism, * Complaints of pain elsewhere in the mouth or in a tooth, * Being pregnant or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain Intensity6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after root canal treatmentPostoperative pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates the worst pain imaginable; higher scores indicate greater pain severity

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026