Skip to content

Evaluation of the Comfort Increase Provided by an Additional Foam Pad on a Lumbar Belt and Its Biophysical Impact

Evaluation of the Comfort Increase Provided by an Additional Foam Pad on a Lumbar Belt "Cellacare Lumbal Classic - Lohmann & Rauscher" and Its Biophysical Impact

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07355790
Acronym
CONFORT
Enrollment
15
Registered
2026-01-21
Start date
2025-12-09
Completion date
2027-11-01
Last updated
2026-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Volunteer, Low Back Pain

Keywords

Lumbar belt, back insert, confort

Brief summary

The spine is the central musculoskeletal system of the back. It carries and supports a major part of the body weight and ensures simultaneously the trunk's mobility, particularly the mobility of the lumbar spine and the head's mobility by moving the cervical spine. Back pain in the lumbar spine area is the most common kind of pain with a prevalence of 60 to 70 per cent in industrialized countries (Jellema2001).

Detailed description

Back orthosis permits temporary support and stress reduction (in terms of load) of the concerned structures and first of all intervertebral disks. The aim of this study is to evaluate the comfort variation with and without the additional back insert, with the hypothesis that a more comfortable lumbar belt would improve the care observance. This study also aims to verify the relevancy of objective indicators such as pressure measurement and disk hydration for the added benefice of the back insert.

Interventions

DEVICEMRI

MRI in the evening without lumbar belt

DEVICEMRI evening 2

MRI in the evening after wearing the lumbar belt for one day

DEVICEMRI evening 1

MRI in the evening after wearing the lumbar belt with additional back insert for one day

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Lead SponsorOTHER
Lohmann & Rauscher
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy volunteer, men or women, aged 18 to 50 years old without lumbar pathology. * Volunteer beneficiary of a social security scheme. * Volunteer informed about the study and having co-signed a consent form to participate to the study with the investigator

Exclusion criteria

* Protected persons * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Persons deprived of freedom, hospitalised without consent, hospitalised with other ends then research. * Adults under legal protection (protection of vulnerable adults) or not able to express consent. * Persons showing gait difficulties (test on treadmill) or with neurological/joint pathologies promoting falls (Parkinson, hemiplegia, …) * Patient seen by a doctor for lumbar pain in the 2 months prior to the inclusion. * Patient suffering from scoliosis * Refusal of consent * Contraindication to MRI * Patient carrying an internal electronic device (pacemaker, neurostimulator, insulin pump…) * Patient with known allergies to one of the product components (e.g. latex) * During the first MRI, volunteers showing prior signs of lower back pain or discopathy will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ComfortDay1Comfort is measuring with a scale : 0 = uncomfortable, 10 = extremely comfortable

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTHubert MAROTTE, MD PhD
hubert.marotte@chu-st-etienne.fr(0)477127639
CONTACTFlorence RANCON, CDP
florence.rancon@chu-st-etienne.fr(0)477829458
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHubert MAROTTE, MD PhD

CHU de Saint-Etienne

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026