Skip to content

Videolaryngoscopic Difficult ıntubation and Glottic View Score: A Multicentre Prospective Study

Prediction of Difficult Videolaryngoscopic Intubation and Development of a Dedicated Glottic View Score: A Multicentre Prospective Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07355608
Acronym
VIDIGLOV
Enrollment
4977
Registered
2026-01-21
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2027-02-01
Last updated
2026-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management

Keywords

Airway management, Videolaryngoscope, Difficult airway

Brief summary

Background: Videolaryngoscopy has improved glottic visualization and facilitated tracheal intubation. However, difficulties-including failed intubation-still occur. At present, no prospectively derived classification system exists to assess the difficulty of videolaryngoscopic (VL) intubation across both normal and anticipated difficult airways. Additionally, current glottic view grading systems, designed for direct laryngoscopy, may not adequately capture the specific challenges of VL intubation. Objectives: This study aims to: 1. Develop a predictive model for difficult VL intubation in surgical patients with both normal and anticipated difficult airways. 2. Create a glottic view scoring system specifically tailored to videolaryngoscopy. 3. Compare the predictive accuracy of the new scoring system with existing laryngeal view grades in forecasting difficult VL intubation.

Detailed description

Background: Videolaryngoscopy has improved glottic visualization and facilitated tracheal intubation. However, difficulties-including failed intubation-still occur. At present, no prospectively derived classification system exists to assess the difficulty of videolaryngoscopic (VL) intubation across both normal and anticipated difficult airways. Additionally, current glottic view grading systems, designed for direct laryngoscopy, may not adequately capture the specific challenges of VL intubation. Objectives: This study aims to: 1. Develop a predictive model for difficult VL intubation in surgical patients with both normal and anticipated difficult airways. 2. Create a glottic view scoring system specifically tailored to videolaryngoscopy. 3. Compare the predictive accuracy of the new scoring system with existing laryngeal view grades in forecasting difficult VL intubation. Methods: A prospective cohort of 4,977 patients will be enrolled. Patient and intubation related variables-including VL findings, airway features, clinical parameters, device, and procedural details-will be analyzed. Binary logistic regression will be employed to build the initial predictive model. In parallel, machine learning techniques (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, XGBoost, LightGBM, etc.) will be applied to evaluate predictive performance. Comparative analysis will be conducted between the machine learning models and the logistic regression baseline. Expected Impact: The development of a robust predictive tool and an associated VL-specific glottic view score could enhance clinical decision making, particularly in identifying patients at risk of difficult or failed VL intubation. This may support early consideration of awake tracheal intubation, and use of standardized terminology and reduce complications associated with difficult airway management

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults * Both with normal or predicted difficult airways * Undergoing orotracheal intubation with a videolarygoscope

Exclusion criteria

* Rapid sequence intubation * Double lumen tube intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Failed first intubation attempt2 minutes after anesthesia inductionFailed to intubate at firtst attempt
Failed intubation2 minutes after anesthesia inductionNot able to intubate the patient
Intubation duration2 minutes after anesthesia inductionTime elapsed from entring the blade between the teeth to detecting an entidal carbondioxide trace
Glottic view description2 minutes after anesthesia inductionVocal cords are fully visible Vocal cords are partially separately Vocal cords are not visible Cords are adducted Epiglottis is visible Epiglottis is large Epiglottis is small Epiglottis is edematous Epiglottis mass is present Arytenoids are visible Arytenoid luxation or subluxation Arytenoid edema Valecula problem (edema, Coffee grounds, etc., unable to insert a blade) Aryepiglottic plica pathology (edema, Coffee grounds scar) Laryngeal structures should be formed Glottic stenosis Laryngospasm
Difficult intubation2 minutes after anesthesia inductionFailed to intubate at 1-2 attempts and/or intubation duration longer than 120 second

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentil of glottic opening score2 minutes after anesthesia inductionthe percentage of glottic opening seen, defined by the linear span from the anterior commissure to the inter-arytenoid notch
Cormack lehanne score2 minutes after anesthesia inductiongrade 1 being a full view of the glottis, grade 2 being a partial view, grade 3 being only a view of the epiglottis, and grade 4 being an absent view of the glottis and epiglottis

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTDilek Yazıcıoğlu Ünal, Professor
dilekunalmd@gmail.com+90 5336957855
CONTACTEmel Gündüz, assoc.
dregunduz@hotmail.com,+905444341719
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDilek Yazıcıoğlu Ünal, professor

Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 12, 2026