Skip to content

Selective Curettage and Tissue Adhesive in Endodontic Microsurgery

Impact of Selective Curettage and Tissue Adhesive on the Clinical Outcomes of Endodontic Microsurgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07353580
Acronym
Microsurgery
Enrollment
24
Registered
2026-01-20
Start date
2024-12-25
Completion date
2026-02-27
Last updated
2026-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healing and Patient Related Outcomes

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine whether selective curettage combined with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive improves clinical outcomes in endodontic microsurgery compared with the conventional approach. The study purpose is to evaluate the postoperative healing associated with this conservative surgical protocol. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does selective curettage with tissue adhesive reduce postoperative pain, swelling, and complications compared to complete curettage with suturing? How does selective curettage affect clinical and radiographic healing of persistent periapical lesions? Researchers compared complete lesion curettage with suturing to selective curettage (40-70% lesion removal) with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive closure to assess differences in healing and patient-related outcomes. Participants : Underwent endodontic microsurgery using one of the two surgical protocols Attended follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 7 days for clinical evaluation of pain, swelling ,Discomfort , Bleeding , Local reaction and Wound Dehiscence Attended follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months for clinical and radiographic evaluation of periapical healing using 2D radiographs and CBCT

Interventions

PROCEDURESelective Lesion Curettage and Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive

Selective curettage is a conservative approach to treat periapical lesions by removing part of the granulomatous tissue while avoiding complications and damage to the neighboring structures. It also provides the least traumatic approach with minimal post-operative complications. It had an additional advantage, which is providing tissue samples for biopsy of the lesion, especially in cases where there was a diagnostic dilemma regarding its origin . In the selective curettage technique, approximately 50-70% of the granulomatous tissue was removed while preserving the portion in close proximity to critical areas, followed by standard root-end resection and retrofilling then Clinical and radiographic assessments, including CBCT, for bone healing assesment .

PROCEDUREComplete Periapical Lesion Curettage and Suturing

Complete Periapical Lesion Curettage and Suturing is a conventional endodontic microsurgical procedure performed to manage persistent periapical pathology following root canal treatment. After administration of local anesthesia, a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap is elevated to expose the periapical region. The periapical lesion is completely curetted and removed, followed by apical root-end resection. A retrograde cavity is prepared using ultrasonic tips and sealed with a biocompatible root-end filling material. Hemostasis is achieved, and the surgical flap is repositioned and stabilized using conventional sutures. This approach represents the standard surgical protocol for endodontic microsurgery and serves as the active comparator in this study.

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 years and older consenting to the surgical procedure as well as agreeing to preoperative and at least 1 follow-up CBCT evaluation. 2. Noncontributory medical history (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I, II). 3. Teeth with periapical lesions that had been previously treated or retreated but symptoms persist or recurrent. 4. Radiographic presence of true endodontic lesion close to vital critical structure.

Exclusion criteria

1. Nonconsenting patients and patients younger than 18 years of age. 2. Medical history with the American Society of Anesthesiologists class III to V. 3. Insufficient coronal restoration. 4. Nonrestorability or traumatized teeth. 5. Mobility \> 1. 6. Vertical root fracture.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity(1st, 3rd, and 7th day post-operative)Pain intensity is assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10)
Swelling1st, 3rd, and 7th day post-operativePresence of swelling is assessed clinically by visual inspection and physical examination and recorded as a binary outcome (present / absent)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bleeding1st, 3rd, and 7th day post-operativePost-operative bleeding presence is assessed as a binary outcome (Yes / No)
Radiographic Bone healing3, 6 , and 12 monthsRadiographic bone healing is assessed using standardized periapical radiographs (2D) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT, 3D)

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMohamed A El-dreny, Assis.Lec

Faculty of Dentistry , Mansoura University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026