Skip to content

Is Pulse Co-Oximetry a Reliable Alternative to Invasive Hemoglobin Measurement in Pediatric Neurosurgical Procedures?

Is Pulse Co-Oximetry a Reliable Alternative to Invasive Hemoglobin Measurement in Pediatric Neurosurgical Procedures?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07352033
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-01-20
Start date
2024-12-01
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2026-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia (Diagnosis)

Brief summary

The study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of continuous SpHb across a comprehensive pediatric age spectrum-ranging from neonates to adolescents-undergoing high-risk neurosurgical procedures (cranial and spinal) characterized by significant potential for blood loss.

Interventions

Continuous non-invasive measurement of total hemoglobin (SpHb) using a pulse co-oximetry sensor during the surgery.

Sponsors

Selcuk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Months to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA I-IV, * Scheduled for elective complex spinal surgery or cranial procedures under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* congenital heart disease * requirement for emergency surgery * pre-existing peripheral circulatory disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Agreement and Correlation between Non-invasive Hemoglobin (SpHb) and Invasive Arterial Hemoglobin (Hb) levels.Intraoperative period (from induction of anesthesia to extubation, approximately 2-5 hours

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026