Skip to content

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Lateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Open Abendectomy Surgery

Analgeisc Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Lateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Open Abendectomy Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07351253
Enrollment
68
Registered
2026-01-20
Start date
2026-01-25
Completion date
2026-05-01
Last updated
2026-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Appendicectomy, Postoperative Analgesia, Regional Anaesthesia

Brief summary

this aim of this study is to compare the analgesic effect of Erector spinae plane (ESP) block and lateral transversus abdominis plan (TAP) block in patients undergoing open appendectomy.

Detailed description

regional technique according to randomization will be given after induction of general anesthesia Fentanyl boluses of 1 mcg/kg will be given in case of inadequate analgesia. Inadequate analgesia identified by 20% increase in the heart rate and/or systolic blood pressure from baseline measurement. postoperative analgesia: regular paracetamol 1 g/6 hours (intravenously at first then orally once the oral feeding is resumed) and 75 mg diclofenac (intramuscularly at first then orally once the oral feeding is resumed). If Numeric rating scale (NRS) is \> 3 intravenous titration of 2 mg morphine is given slowly to be repeated after 30 minutes if pain persisted

Interventions

OTHERErector Spinae Plane Block

Patients will receive the ESP block at the level of the 10th thoracic (T10) transverse process using a linear 6-13 MHz ultrasound transducer. A 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected below the muscle

OTHERTransversus abdominis plane (TAP) block

Patient will received TAP block using the lateral approach while in supine position. A 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected after negative aspiration.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, undergoing open appendectomy.

Exclusion criteria

* American society of anesthesiologist-physical status \>III, * allergy to any of the study drugs, * coagulopathy * local infection, * history of chronic pain or regular opioid use; * inability to comprehend the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), * pregnant or lactating women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total morphine consumptionfrom extubation until 24 hours postoperativemg

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
numeric rating scaleAT 0.5, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperative.a scale of 0-10, where 0 means "no pain" and 10 means "worst imaginable pain"
quality of recovery24 hours after suregryassessed using Quality of recovery-15 (QOR-15); Consists of 15 items evaluating five dimensions of health: physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, emotional state, and pain. Scoring Range: Each item is rated on an 11-point numerical scale (0 to 10). The total score ranges from 0 (extremely poor recovery) to 150 (excellent recovery).

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTMaha Mostafa, MD
maha.mostafa@cu.edu.eg+201000365115

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026