Skip to content

Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation Adapted for Patients With Heart Failure

RAP-IC Study: Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation Adapted for Patients With Heart Failure

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07350941
Acronym
RAP-IC
Enrollment
114
Registered
2026-01-20
Start date
2026-01-30
Completion date
2028-01-01
Last updated
2026-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Heart Failure, Cardiac rehabilitation, Cardiopulmonary stress test, Functional capacity

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether a tailored cardiac rehabilitation program, initiated during hospitalization and continued after discharge, can improve functional capacity, mobility, and quality of life in patients over 65 years old with heart failure.

Detailed description

If you meet the inclusion criteria and wish to participate, an initial assessment of your clinical and functional status will be conducted during your hospital stay. A computer system will then randomly assign you to one of the following groups: Cardiac Rehabilitation Group (treatment group): You will participate in a mild exercise program during hospitalization (Phase I), including mobility and respiratory exercises adapted to your clinical condition. After discharge, you will enter a structured in-person cardiac rehabilitation program (Phase II) lasting 3 months, consisting of two 1-hour exercise sessions per week (aerobic, strength, inspiratory, and proprioceptive exercises) plus one weekly educational session. Usual Care Group (control group): You will receive standard recommendations for physical activity and general care. At the end of the study, a final consultation will be conducted to assess differences between the two groups in functional capacity and quality of life.

Interventions

Cardiac rehabilitation program, in which patients will attend in person twice weekly (Mondays and Wednesdays or Tuesdays and Thursdays), in groups of up to 8 patients, for 1-hour exercise sessions including aerobic, resistance, respiratory, and balance/proprioceptive components. Sessions will be monitored and supervised by cardiologists, rehabilitation physicians, and physiotherapists. In addition, patients will attend one weekly in-person educational session throughout the 3-month program.

Sponsors

Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients hospitalized for acute heart failure in a stable phase (on a stable dose or tapering intravenous diuretics for at least 48 hours, without intravenous inotropes or vasodilators for \>72 hours). * Baseline functional class II-III * Age ≥ 65 years * Able to walk \>4 meters * Any range of left ventricular ejection fraction

Exclusion criteria

* Moderate to severe dementia * Cardiac or other disease with a life expectancy \<12 months * Institutionalized patients or unable to travel to the rehabilitation center * Functional class I or IV * Uncontrolled arrhythmias * Inability to perform a basic exercise protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Endpoint: Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake3 monthsChange in peak oxygen uptake measured by treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise testing (peak VO₂, measured in ml/kg/min).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Functional Permormance assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score3 monthsChange in the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, ranging from 0 (worst physical performance) to 12 (best physical performance).
Change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-23 (KCCQ-23) score3 and 6 monthsChange in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-23 (KCCQ-23) overall summary score, ranging from 0 (worst health status) to 100 (best health status)
Change in distance walked (meters) in the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).3 and 6 monthsChange in distance walked (meters) in the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).
Change in caregiver burden assessed by the Zarit scale3 and 6 monthsChange in caregiver burden assessed by the 22-item Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-22) score (range 0-88, with higher scores indicating greater caregiver burden)
Change in body composition parameters assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)3 and 6 monthsChange in body composition parameters expressed as percentages (%), assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)
Number of participants experiencing all-cause mortality, heart failure decompensation, or heart failure-related hospitalization during follow-up3 and 6 monthsAll-cause mortality will be confirmed by medical records or death certificate. Heart failure decompensation will be defined as worsening of heart failure symptoms requiring urgent medical visit, treatment adjustment, or hospital admission. Heart failure-related hospitalizations will be collected from hospital records. Data will be aggregated as the number and percentage of participants experiencing each event during the study period
Change in Frailty status assessed by FRAIL scale3 and 6 monthsChange in FRAIL scale (range 0-5, higher scores indicate greater frailty)
Change in emotional status assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)3 and 6 monthsChange in emotional status, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), with subscales for anxiety and depression ranging from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity
Change in Nutritional Status assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) score3 and 6 monthsChange in nutritional status, assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) score (range 0-30, with higher scores indicating better nutritional status)
Change in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)3 and 6 monthsChange in maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) measured in cmH₂O, with higher values indicating greater respiratory muscle strength
Patient satisfaction6 monthsPatient satisfaction with the cardiac rehabilitation program, rated from 0 to 10, being 10 the highest mark
Patient adherence3 monthsPatient adherence to cardiac rehabilitation sessions, rated from 0 to 100%, being 100% the highest mark
Change in basic functional independence assessed by the Barthel Index3 and 6 monthsChange in basic functional independence assessed by the Barthel Index (range 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater independence)
Change in maximal expiratory pressure (MEP)3 ad 6 monthsChange in maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) measured in cmH₂O, with higher values indicating greater respiratory muscle strength

Countries

Spain

Contacts

CONTACTMargarita Calvo-Lopez, MD
margarita.calvo@salud.madrid.org+34637090285
CONTACTJuan Carlos Lopez Azor, MD, PhD
lopez.gcia.juan.carlos@gmail.com+34628026462
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMargarita Calvo-LOpez, MD

Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026