Amputation, Prosthesis, Upper Limb Amputation
Conditions
Keywords
Amputation, bionic hand, myoelectric hand, prosthesis, trans-humeral, trnas-radial
Brief summary
This observational study aims to compare myoelectric and bionic hands in terms of upper extremity function, body image and satisfaction. The main questions it aims to answer are: \- Does upper extremity function differ between bionic and myoelectric hands? The main questions it aims to answer are: Does upper extremity function differ between bionic and myoelectric hands?
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Aged 18 to 65 years * Individuals with unilateral upper limb amputation * Regular use of a prosthetic device for at least 6 months * Use of a semi-electronic elbow joint prosthetic component * Ability to understand and complete study assessments
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of bilateral or multiple limb amputations * Proximal upper limb amputation at the shoulder level or above * Coexisting neurological or orthopedic disorders that may affect upper limb function or study outcomes
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Upper Limb Functionol Index-15 | Baseline | The Upper Limb Functional Index-15 (ULFI-15) is a 15-item patient-reported outcome measure used to assess functional limitations related to the upper extremity. It evaluates difficulties in daily activities, movement, and functional performance of the upper limb. Higher scores indicate greater functional limitation. |
| Amputee Body Image Scale | Baseline | The Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS) is a self-reported questionnaire designed to assess body image perception and body-related concerns in individuals with limb amputation. It measures the psychological impact of amputation on body image, with higher scores reflecting greater body image disturbance. |
| Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey | Baseline | The Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure used to evaluate functional status, satisfaction, and quality of life in individuals using orthotic or prosthetic devices. It assesses the user's perceived functional ability and satisfaction with their prosthetic device and related services. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)