A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Remimazolam Besylate Combined With Alfentanil Versus Propofol Combined With Alfentanil for Anesthesia in Thoracic Surgery

Anesthesia, Non-intubated Anesthesia, Thoracic Surgery

Remimazolam, Alfentanil, Propofol, Non-intubated, Tubeless Anesthesia, Spontaneous Ventilation Spontaneous Ventilation, Total Intravenous Anesthesia Total Intravenous Anesthesia

Title: A Clinical Study Comparing Two Anesthesia Methods for Chest Surgery Why is this study being done? Chest surgeries (like lung surgery) require safe and stable anesthesia. Currently, a drug called propofol combined with an opioid painkiller (alfentanil) is commonly used. However, propofol can sometimes cause low blood pressure and low oxygen levels. A newer drug called remimazolam may cause fewer of these side effects. This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of remimazolam (combined with alfentanil) versus propofol (combined with alfentanil) for anesthesia during chest surgery. What will happen in the study? Patients scheduled for elective chest surgery will be invited to participate. If they agree, they will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to one of two groups: * Group 1: Will receive remimazolam and alfentanil for anesthesia. * Group 2: Will receive propofol and alfentanil for anesthesia (standard care). The anesthesiologist will carefully monitor patients during and after surgery. We will mainly compare how often patients in each group experience two safety issues: low oxygen levels in the blood and low blood pressure. We will also record recovery times, drug doses, side effects, and ask patients and surgeons about their satisfaction. Who can participate? Adults aged 18-65 who are scheduled for elective chest surgery and are in relatively stable health (ASA physical status I-III). Where is the study taking place? This study will be conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology at The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College, Henan, China. Ethics Approval: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College (Approval Number: (2025) Medical Ethics Committee Approval No. 29).

Study Design: This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial. It is designed as a Phase IV study comparing the clinical profiles of two established anesthetic regimens. Background and Rationale: Thoracic surgery, particularly procedures requiring one-lung ventilation, poses significant challenges for anesthetic management, demanding excellent hemodynamic stability and respiratory control. Propofol, while a mainstay for total intravenous anesthesia, is associated with dose-dependent hypotension and respiratory depression. Remimazolam, a novel ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, is metabolized by tissue esterases and may offer a more stable hemodynamic profile. Combining it with the short-acting opioid alfentanil could provide an effective and potentially safer alternative for thoracic anesthesia. This study seeks to generate high-level evidence comparing these two combinations in a surgical setting known for its physiological demands. Intervention Protocol: * Premedication & Induction: All patients will receive standardized premedication. Anesthesia induction will begin with alfentanil (10 μg/kg), followed by the study drug: either Remimazolam Besylate (0.3 mg/kg) or Propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg). * Maintenance: Anesthesia will be maintained via continuous infusion of the assigned study drug (Remimazolam: 0.2-1 mg/kg/h; Propofol: 2-6 mg/kg/h) along with alfentanil (0-1 μg/kg/min), titrated to maintain a Bispectral Index (BIS) value between 40-60. * Standardization: All patients will undergo standardized monitoring, airway management, and surgical and analgesic protocols as per institutional guidelines for thoracic surgery. Primary Objectives: To compare the incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia (SpO₂ \< 90% for \>10 seconds) and intraoperative hypotension (MAP \< 65 mmHg or a decrease \>20% from baseline) between the two groups. Key Secondary Objectives: Include comparison of: hemodynamic variables, need for rescue interventions, times to extubation and recovery, total drug consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV), postoperative pulmonary complications, quality of recovery (QoR-15), and satisfaction scores from patients and surgeons. Statistical Analysis: Data will be analyzed based on the Intention-to-Treat principle. Categorical data will be compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Continuous data will be analyzed using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Subgroup analyses are planned for specific patient populations.

No related papers found yet.