Skip to content

Clinical Study of Myofascial Trigger Points(MTrPs) Injection in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis(OA)

Clinical Study of Myofascial Trigger Points(MTrPs) Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain(CMP), Chronic Migraine and Cervicogenic Headache

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07347028
Enrollment
1036
Registered
2026-01-16
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervicogenic Headache, Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain, Migraine, Myofascial Trigger Points

Brief summary

Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a common disease in China, with a high incidence among the elderly, and has a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Knee osteoarthritis is a common type of CMP. Currently, both domestic and international studies have confirmed that glucocorticoid injection at myofascial trigger points(MTrPs) can alleviate patients' pain symptoms. MTrPs injection is safe and easy to operate, and can improve the clinical management efficiency of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Therefore, we designed a prospective, randomized controlled, blinded outcome, non-inferiority study to compare the long-term clinical efficacy of glucocorticoid injection at myofascial trigger points and complex intra-articular injection in treating knee osteoarthritis. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups and receive either glucocorticoid injection at MTrPs or joint cavities. After treatment, patients will be followed up for 2 years. Their NRS scores, WOMAC scores, Patient Global Impression of Change(PGIC) scale, and adverse reactions will be recorded at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. If the results indicate that the clinical efficacy of myofascial trigger point injection for knee osteoarthritis is not inferior to that of injection at intra-articular injection, it will provide a safe and simple treatment option that is easy to promote for patients who do not respond to conservative treatment.

Interventions

The volume of infiltration solution is determined by the number of trigger points, with each trigger point receiving 1 mL of injection volume. The injection solution is prepared by combining 1 mL of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/mL), lidocaine, and normal saline, resulting in a final lidocaine concentration of 1%. A 25-gauge needle is used to inject perpendicular to the skin surface at the selected tender points, with the solution administered as a single bolus into each tender point within 10 seconds.

Patients in the intra-articular injection group will receive an intra-articular knee injection via an anterolateral approach. The injection solution is prepared using 7 mL of 1% lidocaine and 1 mL of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/mL).

Sponsors

Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis with radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-4) confirmed by at least two orthopedic surgeons, pain specialists, or general practitioners, with physical examination confirming at least one myofascial trigger point; * Disease duration exceeding 3 months; * Age ≥ 45 years; * Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score ≥ 3 points despite prior conservative pharmacological treatment; * Signed informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* History of allergy to trial medications such as corticosteroids; * Alcohol abuse; long-term use of opioids (exceeding 2 weeks or more than 3 days per week for over 1 month); suspected use of sedative or analgesic medications; patients on long-term steroid therapy; * Severe neurological disorders, significant hepatic or renal dysfunction, heart failure, coagulation abnormalities, gastric ulcer, diabetes, inflammatory rheumatic diseases, etc.; * Intra-articular injection within the past 6 months or planned joint replacement surgery; * Inability to use pain assessment scales; * Presence of local or systemic infection; * Pregnant or lactating patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NRS pain scoresat the 4-weeksThe pain intensity of the knee will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NRS pain scoresAt the weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24The pain intensity of the knee will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
WOMAC scoresat the weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24The WOMAC(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) is a standardized instrument specifically designed to assess symptoms and function in patients with knee/hip osteoarthritis. It comprises three dimensions with a total of 24 items: pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function in daily activities (17 items). It utilizes a Likert scale (0-4 points, 0 = no symptoms), with a total score range of 0-96 points (or standardized to 0-100 points). Higher scores indicate greater functional impairment.
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scaleat the weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale is a patient-rated instrument used to evaluate overall change in status following treatment. It employs a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "very much worse" to 7 = "very much improved"), focusing on the patient's subjective perception of symptoms, function, and quality of life. The evaluation criterion defines a score of 5 or higher as indicative of "improvement" (mild/moderate/marked), a score of 4 as "no change," and scores of 3 or below as "worsening."
Adverse ReactionsThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearAny systemic adverse reactions related to corticosteroids such as hyperglycemic reactions, infection at the puncture site, and intra-articular infection.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTFang Luo
13611326978@163.com+86 13611326978

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026