Skip to content

1ry Versus 2ry ILM Peeling in RD

Primary Versus Secondary Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Uncomplicated Retinal Detachment

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07346560
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-01-16
Start date
2025-12-15
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ILM Peeling, Retinal Detachment Rhegmatogenous

Keywords

Retinal detachment, ILM peeling, Proliferative vitroretinopathy

Brief summary

Patients with uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment will be recruited. All eyes will underwent 23G PPV with silicon oil tamponade. The eyes will be classified into two groups according to the timing of ILM peeling. Group A, ILM peelin will be performed during the first intervention, while in group B, it will be done at the time of silicon oil extraction.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPrimary ILM peeling

ILM peeling during the 1st surgical intervention for rRD

PROCEDURESecondary ILM peeling

ILM peeling is delayed for the time of silicon oil extraction

Sponsors

Sohag University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detcahment.

Exclusion criteria

* PVR * Recurrent RD * Tractional RD * Macular hole RD * Scleral buckling is indicated * Macular scarring * Previous PPV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of complicationsFrom enrollment till 3 months postoperative

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTAlaa Sinjab, MD
alaa.abdelsadek@med.sohag.edu.eg+20-01064037382

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026