Skip to content

Comparison Between Supine Mini-PCNL and Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) for Dense Lower Calyceal Stones (1-2 cm) in School-Age Pediatric Patients

Comparison Between Supine Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) in Management of Lower Calyceal Stones 1-2 Centimeters With More Than 1000 Hounsfield Unit in School-Age Pediatric Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07345234
Enrollment
180
Registered
2026-01-15
Start date
2025-01-15
Completion date
2025-06-15
Last updated
2026-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Calculi, Nephrolithiasis, Urolithiasis

Keywords

pediatric, children, school-age, lower calyx, lower pole, renal stone, kidney stone, flexible ureteroscopy, high-density stone, mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy, laser lithotripsy

Brief summary

This randomized controlled clinical study compared supine mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy for the management of dense lower calyceal renal stones measuring 1-2 centimeters (≤20 millimeters) with stone density greater than 1000 Hounsfield units in school-age pediatric patients aged 6-12 years. Participants were randomized to undergo either supine mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy with laser lithotripsy or flexible ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy. The study assessed stone-free rate on non-contrast computed tomography of the urinary tract at 1 month postoperatively, along with operative time, fluoroscopy time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. The trial has ended.

Interventions

PROCEDURESupine Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Percutaneous renal access and tract dilation to mini size in the supine position, followed by endoscopic stone fragmentation using laser lithotripsy, with ureteral stent placement and nephrostomy tube placement per protocol.

Retrograde endoscopic access to the kidney using a flexible ureteroscope with laser lithotripsy for stone fragmentation, followed by ureteral stent placement per protocol.

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This was an open-label study; participants and treating clinicians were aware of the assigned procedure. Outcome assessment was based on postoperative imaging and clinical follow-up.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups to undergo either supine mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy with laser lithotripsy or flexible ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for management of dense lower calyceal renal stones.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 6 to 12 years * Single lower calyceal renal stone measuring 1-2 centimeters (≤20 millimeters) with stone density greater than 1000 Hounsfield units * No previous urological surgery that could distort the pelvicalyceal system

Exclusion criteria

* Additional ureteral stones and/or congenital renal anomalies (for example, horseshoe kidney or pelviureteric junction obstruction) * Multiple renal stones * Untreated urinary tract infection (temporarily excluded until treated)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stone-Free Rate1 month postoperativelyProportion of participants who were stone-free on non-contrast computed tomography of the urinary tract at 1 month after the procedure. Clinically insignificant residual fragments were defined as asymptomatic residual stones smaller than 2 millimeters.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative TimeIntraoperativeTotal operative time for the assigned procedure (in minutes).
Fluoroscopy TimeIntraoperativeTotal fluoroscopy time used during the procedure (in seconds or minutes, per recorded operating room log).
Length of Hospital StayFrom end of procedure (day of surgery) until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days.Duration of postoperative hospital stay (in days) following the procedure.
Intraoperative and Postoperative ComplicationsUp to 3 months postoperativelyFrequency and type of complications occurring intraoperatively and during follow-up after the procedure.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026