Skip to content

Supervised vs Non-Supervised Incentive Spirometry After CABG

Comparison of Lung Function in Post-CABG Patients Administered Supervised and Non-supervised Post-operative Incentive Spirometry: a Quasi-experimental Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07343921
Acronym
SIS-CABG
Enrollment
38
Registered
2026-01-15
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2026-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pulmonary Function Impairment

Keywords

CABG, incentive spirometry, pulmonary function, supervision, postoperative care

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effect of supervised incentive spirometry (SIS) compared to unsupervised incentive spirometry (Non-SIS) on pulmonary function in patients following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Participants perform incentive spirometry exercises twice daily for three days after extubation. Pulmonary function parameters, including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF), are assessed before and after the intervention period to compare changes between the two groups.

Detailed description

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, such as atelectasis, pneumonia, and pleural effusion, which may impair pulmonary function. Incentive spirometry (IS) is commonly used as part of postoperative care to promote deep breathing, enhance alveolar recruitment, and improve lung volumes. This quasi-experimental study is conducted at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia, and enrolls patients who have undergone CABG surgery. Participants are consecutively assigned to one of two intervention groups: supervised incentive spirometry (SIS) or unsupervised incentive spirometry (Non-SIS). Participants in the SIS group perform incentive spirometry exercises under direct supervision by healthcare personnel twice daily to ensure correct technique and adherence. Participants in the Non-SIS group perform the same exercises independently with routine reminders. Both groups receive a standardized postoperative cardiac rehabilitation program. Pulmonary function is assessed using a portable spirometer measuring forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow (PEF). Measurements are conducted at 24 hours post-extubation (T1) and after three days of incentive spirometry exercises (T2). The primary objective is to compare changes in pulmonary function parameters between the supervised and unsupervised groups.

Interventions

PROCEDURESupervised Incentive Spirometry (SIS)

Participants perform incentive spirometry exercises twice daily for 3 days under direct supervision. The supervisor monitors technique, corrects errors, answers questions, and ensures exercises are done accurately. Each session includes 6 sets of 5 breaths, with slow inhalation, 2-second breath-hold, and slow exhalation, separated by rest periods. This intervention is performed in addition to standard cardiac rehabilitation.

PROCEDURENon-Supervised Incentive Spirometry (Non-SIS)

Exercises independently using a guideline form with daily reminders. Participants log activity. 6 sets of 5 breaths per session.

Sponsors

Universitas Padjadjaran
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients aged ≥18 years. * Patients who have undergone Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery. * Mechanical ventilation \<24 hours post-surgery. * Physically able to perform incentive spirometry (IS) exercises. * Signed informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Hemodynamically unstable patients. * Patients with cognitive or communication impairments. * Oral abnormalities that prevent the use of IS. * Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). * Patients with thoracic anomalies. * Patients who required reintubation. * History of incentive spirometry use within the last 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)T1 (24 hours post-extubation) and T2 (after 3 days of incentive spirometry exercise)Measures the volume of air that can be forcibly exhaled in one second to assess pulmonary function in post-CABG patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)T1 (24 hours post-extubation) and T2 (after 3 days of incentive spirometry exercise)Measures the total volume of air that can be exhaled after a maximal inhalation to evaluate restrictive ventilatory patterns in post-CABG patients.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)T1 (24 hours post-extubation) and T2 (after 3 days of incentive spirometry exercise)Measures the maximal airflow during forced exhalation to assess the ability of the lungs to expel air in post-CABG patients.

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026