Skip to content

Robot/Laparoscopic-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel Versus Modified Soave Pull-Through for TCA

Robot/Laparoscopic-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel Versus Modified Soave Pull-Through for Total Colonic Hirschsprung Disease: A Multicenter Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07343622
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-01-15
Start date
2026-01-30
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Duhamel, Hirschsprung Disease, Soave, Total Colonic Aganglionosis

Keywords

Robotic surgery, total colonic aganglionosis, modified Duhamel procedure, modified Soave procedure, Hirschsprung disease

Brief summary

Total colonic Hirschsprung disease (TCA) is the most severe form of Hirschsprung disease and is commonly managed with neonatal enterostomy followed by delayed definitive pull-through. Despite widespread use, the optimal reconstructive procedure for TCA remains uncertain. The Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through procedures are the two most frequently adopted techniques, each with distinct theoretical advantages and limitations regarding bowel function, enterocolitis risk, and anorectal physiology. With the increasing application of minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery, both procedures have been further refined; however, robust comparative evidence, particularly for total colonic disease, is lacking. To date, no multicenter study has provided a detailed comparison of postoperative functional outcomes and Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis between transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave procedures. This multicenter study compares robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through in patients with pathologically confirmed TCA after neonatal enterostomy, focusing on postoperative bowel function and enterocolitis incidence.

Detailed description

Total colonic Hirschsprung disease (TCA), also referred to as total colonic aganglionosis, represents the most severe phenotype of Hirschsprung disease and remains a major surgical challenge. Owing to extensive aganglionosis, poor nutritional status, and high risk of enterocolitis in the neonatal period, the current standard of care in most centers consists of neonatal enterostomy followed by a delayed definitive pull-through as a second-stage procedure. Despite advances in minimally invasive techniques, the optimal reconstructive strategy for TCA has not been established. Among available options, the Duhamel procedure and the modified Soave pull-through are the two most commonly adopted techniques. The Duhamel approach, particularly when combined with a transanal external transection, preserves a retrorectal colonic reservoir, which may reduce anastomotic tension and theoretically improve postoperative bowel function. However, concerns remain regarding fecal stasis, residual spur formation, and the potential risk of postoperative enterocolitis. In contrast, the modified Soave procedure achieves complete endorectal pull-through and eliminates the aganglionic rectal segment, but it may be associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic stricture, cuff-related obstruction, and impaired anorectal motility, especially in patients with extensive disease such as TCA. With the increasing adoption of robot-assisted and laparoscopic techniques, both procedures have been refined; nevertheless, direct comparative data evaluating functional outcomes, Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis, and perioperative parameters between transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave procedures-particularly in total colonic disease-remain scarce. To date, no multicenter study has provided a detailed, standardized comparison of these two surgical strategies in patients with pathologically confirmed TCA. Therefore, this multicenter study aims to compare robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through in patients with total colonic Hirschsprung disease who underwent neonatal enterostomy, with a primary focus on postoperative bowel function and the incidence of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis.

Interventions

PROCEDURETransanal Transection Duhamel operation

The modified Duhamel procedure was performed using a transanal external rectal transection technique. Following mobilization of the ganglionated colon, the distal rectum was transected externally through the anal canal, expanding pelvic operative space and improving exposure compared with conventional pelvic transection. A retrorectal channel was created, and the colon was pulled through posterior to the native rectum. Residual rectal septum (spur) was eliminated using a transanal external compression technique, enabling a wide side-to-side colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. The anterior rectal wall was preserved, maintaining rectal sensory structures and avoiding circumferential endorectal dissection as used in Soave procedures. This approach was intended to optimize anastomotic configuration and postoperative bowel function.

PROCEDUREModified Soave Pull-Through

The modified Soave procedure was performed as a definitive pull-through following neonatal enterostomy. At approximately 1 year of age or older, patients underwent minimally invasive colectomy using a robotic-assisted or laparoscopic approach. The entire aganglionic colon was resected, and an endorectal pull-through was performed. The terminal ileum was delivered through the rectal cuff and anastomosed to the anal canal to restore intestinal continuity. This technique eliminates the aganglionic colorectal segment and avoids creation of a retrorectal pouch. Perioperative management and postoperative care were standardized across participating centers according to the study protocol.

Sponsors

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shenzhen Longhua District Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zunyi Medical College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Definitive diagnosis of total colonic Hirschsprung disease confirmed by pathology from biopsy at neonatal enterostomy, consistent with total colonic aganglionosis. 2. Two-stage surgical strategy: neonatal enterostomy performed first, followed by definitive pull-through as a second-stage procedure. 3. Planned definitive reconstruction by one of the following techniques: 4. Robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel, orModified Soave pull-through (minimally invasive abdominal phase allowed). 5. Availability for follow-up assessments and outcomes collection per protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome). 2. Definitive surgery performed by open laparotomy approach or Swenson procedure. 3. One-stage primary pull-through without neonatal enterostomy (single-stage definitive management).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative bowel functionFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 monthsDefecation function will be evaluated using the Rintala scoring, which comprises seven domains: bowel control, awareness of the urge to defecate, defecation frequency, stool consistency, fecal soiling, constipation, and social functioning. A total score of 17-20 points is classified as excellent, 12-16 points as good, 9-11 points as fair, and ≤8 points as poor.24 months after definitive pull-through .
Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) incidenceFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 monthsHAEC diagnosed using a standardized criterion ( prespecified clinical criteria) and recorded as: cumulative incidence, number of episodes, episodes requiring hospitalization/IV antibiotics.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative length of stay (days)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
postoperative complicationswithin 30 days and within 12 monthsOverall postoperative complications within 30 days and within 12 months: anastomotic stricture, postoperative bleeding, perianal dermatitis, other prespecified surgical complications (ileus, pelvic abscess, reoperation)
Number of anal dilatationswithin 6 and 12 monthsNumber of anal dilatations required (count) within 6 and 12 months
Operative timeDuring surgeryDuring definitive pull-through operation
Dehydration episodesFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 monthsDehydration episodes (count) requiring medical intervention within 24 months.
Hospital readmissionsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 monthsHospital readmissions (count) within 24 months.
Anal resting pressureFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 monthsAnal resting pressure measured by anorectal manometry (mmHg) at a standardized postoperative time point (6 months, 12 months and 24 months).
Intraoperative blood loss (ml)During surgery

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contactzebing zheng, M.D
zebing1988@sina.com+86-19985120815

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026