Skip to content

Quality of Life in Hereditary and Inflammatory Peripheral Neuropathies

Cross-sectional Observational Study on the Impact of Neuromuscular Diseases on Quality of Life: Focus on Peripheral Neuropathies (Hereditary vs Inflammatory)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07340749
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-01-14
Start date
2026-02-01
Completion date
2026-07-01
Last updated
2026-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hereditary and Inflammatory Peripheral Neuropathies

Brief summary

Neuromuscular diseases affect the nerves and muscles and can cause weakness, pain, fatigue, and difficulties in daily life. These problems may reduce independence, social participation, and overall quality of life.This observational study aims to evaluate the impact of peripheral neuropathies on quality of life. It focuses on two types of peripheral neuropathies: hereditary neuropathies, caused by genetic factors, and inflammatory neuropathies, caused by immune-related nerve damage. Adult patients with these conditions will be assessed at a single time point, without any change to their usual medical care. Participants will complete questionnaires about daily functioning, well-being, and quality of life. Some questions will also explore the use of assistive devices and supportive tools in everyday life.The study hypothesizes that peripheral neuropathies significantly affect quality of life and that this impact differs between hereditary and inflammatory forms. The results aim to improve understanding of patients' needs and support better, more personalized care.

Interventions

WHODAS 2.0: Assesses daily functioning and disability across six domains: understanding, mobility, self-care, interpersonal relationships, domestic activities, and social participation. WHOQOL-BREF: Measures overall quality of life in four domains: physical, psychological, social relationships, and environment. MPT Questionnaire (SOTU and ATD PA): Evaluates participants' attitudes, perceptions, and professional practices in a specific organizational or educational context.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical and paraclinical diagnosis compatible with hereditary or inflammatory peripheral neuropathy, confirmed by the investigating physicians (genetic results for HPN if available; clinical/electrophysiological criteria for IPN). * Written informed consent. * Ability to complete the questionnaires (or with the assistance of a caregiver if necessary, specifying the mode of assistance).

Exclusion criteria

* Legal incapacity (under guardianship or conservatorship). * Moderate to severe cognitive impairment (e.g., MMSE \< 27) preventing valid comprehension and completion of the questionnaires. * Active cancer undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy (treatment likely to significantly alter quality of life in a non-specific way). * Other acute serious medical conditions that could interfere with assessment, at the investigator's discretion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF score)At the inclusionQuality of life (WHOQOL-BREF score) at baseline (M0) in patients with hereditary peripheral neuropathy (HPN) and inflammatory peripheral neuropathy (IPN)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Association between functioning and quality of lifeAt the inclusioncorrelation between WHODAS 2.0 scores and WHOQOL-BREF scores.
Factors associated with impaired functioning and quality of lifeAt the inclusionidentification of clinical or demographic variables linked to lower WHODAS 2.0 or WHOQOL-BREF scores.
Role of assistive technologies (MPT)At the inclusionEvaluation of the impact or use of assistive technologies on functioning and quality of life.
Comparison of perceived quality of lifeAt the inclusionComparison of perceived quality of life between HPN and IPN groups using WHOQOL-BREF scores
Activity restrictionsAt the inclusionAssessment using WHODAS 2.0 scores
Environmental factorsAt the inclusionAssessment using WHODAS 2.0 scores
Profile of limitationsAt the inclusionAssessment using WHODAS 2.0 scores to describe functional limitations

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactSabrina Sacconi
sacconi.s@chu-nice.fr0492038953
Backup ContactSlioui :Abderhmane
:slioui.a@chu-nice.fr0492038953

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026