Manual Dexterity, Sensory Integration Dysfunction, Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis, Vibration
Conditions
Keywords
stroke, haptic, vibration, sensorimotor impairment, manual dexterity, prediction of recovery, MRI
Brief summary
In the proposed research, we will assess motor and sensory functions of the hand using clinical tests and a tool designed to measure manual dexterity combined with vibrotactile stimulation. We will also evaluate the integrity of brain structure and function using MRI.
Detailed description
In this study, 90 post-stroke patients will be followed over three visits at 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after stroke. Manual dexterity will be assessed using the Dextrain Manipulandum, both with and without the addition of finger vibrations. These vibrations will be delivered using vibratory rings, a tool that has been developed and is currently being validated in healthy participants and in patients with chronic post-stroke conditions. These measurements will allow us to quantify haptic facilitation, that is the impact of adding finger vibrations on hand motor function. During each of the three visits, we will also administer validated sensory, motor, and cognitive clinical assessments, as well as anatomical, resting-state functional, and diffusion MRI sequences to investigate brain structure and function in relation to this haptic facilitation. These longitudinal measurements will enable the development of biomarkers of motor recovery of manual dexterity after stroke, with the primary objective of improving the prediction of dexterity recovery using a regression model.
Interventions
DEVICEHaptic stimulation device
Both patients and healthy participants will perform manual dexterity tasks using the Dextrain Manipulandum. In addition, they will receive finger vibrations delivered via rings that we have previously developed. These vibrations will have a frequency of 150 Hz and will be delivered for a duration of 150 ms.
OTHERBrain MRI
Subjects and patients will undergo anatomical, resting-state functional, and diffusion brain MRI sequences.
Sponsors
Centre Hospitalier St Anne
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* First symptomatic stroke, ischaemic or haemorrhagic in the early subacute phase (up to 3 weeks post-stroke) * Upper limb paresis (≤4/5 MRC Scale) * Ability to grasp, lift and put down 1 block (from the BBT test) * Be affiliated to a social security
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of another neurological or musculoskeletal condition affecting upper limb movement * Severe cognitive impairment and/or aphasia with inability to understand and carry out instructions * Contraindications to MRI (claustrophobia, presence of cochlear implants and/or pacemakers) * Persons subject to legal protection measures * Persons subject to judicial protection measures * Pregnancy * Life-threatening conditions or conditions requiring follow-up at 6 months * Epilepsy * Known hypersensitivity or allergy to silicone
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Gain in the prediction of manual dexterity recovery | 3 months post enrollment | The primary outcome measure is a 10% improvement in the prediction of the Box and Block Test (BBT) score at 3 and 6 months post-stroke achieved by adding the haptic effect to a multivariate model. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Predicting recovery in various clinical tests of motor and sensory function and activity limitations at 3 months and 6 months post-stroke. | 3 and 6 months post enrollment | Determine whether the haptic effect VS absence of haptic effect improves the prediction of recovery from motor impairment (Fugl Mayer Assessment for Upper Extremity FMA-UE, Purdue Pegboard Test), sensitivity (monofilaments and Nottingham Sensory Assessment), and activity limitations (Stroke Impact Scale) of the upper limb from 3 weeks to 3 and 6 months post-stroke. |
| Difference in functional and structural connectivity between subgroups with vs without haptic effect at 3 and 6 months | 3 and 6 months post enrollement | Investigate whether connectivity of fronto-parietal networks at 3 weeks post-stroke predicts recovery of haptic effect and dexterity at 3 and 6 months. |
| Change in the prediction of the Box and Block Test (BBT) score when taking into account the haptic effect during an index finger force control task. | 3 and 6 months post enrollment | Determine whether the haptic effect calculated during an index finger force control exercise (using the dextrain manipulandum) measured in the acute phase after stroke can improve the prediction of manual dexterity recovery (Box and Blocks Test, BBT) at 3 months and 6 months after stroke. |
| Difference in brain connectivity between brain images of healthy subjects and patients 3 weeks post-stroke and healthy subjects and patients 6 months post-stroke. | 6 months post enrollement | Compare brain connectivity between the group of healthy subjects and the group of patients at 3 weeks and 6 months post-stroke. |
| Correlation between the location of the lesion at 3 weeks and the haptic effect and the results of clinical tests | 3 and 6 months post stroke | These correlations will be done using Voxel Based Lesion Symptoms Mapping technique (VLSM) |
| Changes in the structural and functional connectivity of fronto-parietal networks between 3 weeks and 6 months post-stroke | 3 and 6 months post stroke | A difference in the change in connectivity between subgroups with versus without haptic effect at 6 months will be investigated. |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactPavel Lindberg
Outcome results
None listed