Skip to content

Micro-ultrasound-Guided Focal Laser Ablation for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Safety & Effectiveness

Micro-ultrasound-Guided Focal Laser Ablation (MicroUSgFLA) Treatment for Management of Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07339943
Acronym
MicroUSgFLA
Enrollment
7
Registered
2026-01-14
Start date
2025-04-30
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer, Prostate Cancer (Adenocarcinoma)

Keywords

Micro-Ultrasound Guided Focal Laser Ablation, Focal Therapy, Focal Laser Ablation, Minimally Invasive Treatment, Laser Therapy

Brief summary

This clinical research study is intended to show that Micro-Ultrasound Guided Focal Laser Ablation (MicroUSgFLA) is a safe procedure that can significantly postpone or eliminate the need for patients with intermediate-Risk prostate cancer (PCa) to undergo a definitive treatment (i.e., Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation Therapy) for their disease.

Detailed description

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men, and a large proportion of these diagnoses are of the low or intermediate risk type that are amenable to a minimally invasive approach to treatment such as Focal Therapy. If successful, this study will show that trans-perineal interstitial laser focal therapy of the prostate could be offered over a wider community setting than only at a major hospital as an Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), to confidently locate the Index Lesion would not be required because MicroUS is showing the same potential to visualize the lesion. MicroUS-guided focal laser ablation would be a simpler treatment than the complexity required under MRI, it could be offered in communities that might not have local access to MRI facilities and could be offered to individuals who are contra-indicated for MRI for such reasons as having metallic implants or severe claustrophobia.

Interventions

PROCEDURE6 month, prospective, interventional single-arm safety and effectiveness study

x

DEVICEThe TRANBERG|CLS Thermal therapy

Micro Ultrasound Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer by The Diode Laser System - The TRANBERGCLS\|Thermal Therapy

Sponsors

Exact Imaging
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Clinical Laserthermia Systems AB
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

6 Month, Prospective, Interventional, Open-label Single-Arm Effectiveness Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men 40-80 years of age. * Histologically-proven intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 7, primary grade ≤ 4). * PCa clinical stage T1c or T2. * MRI/MicroUS site suspicious for cancer or cancer mapped to one prostate lobe. * Maximum dimension of MRI/MicroUS visible tumour ≤15mm. * Suspicious site on Prostate MRI/MicroUS must coincide with sector positive for cancer on biopsy. * Prostate specific antigen (PSA) level \< 15 ng/mL. * IPSS, ICIQ-UI-SF, IIEF-15 questionnaires completed prior to the procedure. * Life expectancy of greater than 10 years, based on co-morbidity not related to PCa.

Exclusion criteria

* Maximum dimension of MRI/MicroUS visible tumour \> 15 mm. * Patients medically unfit for focal therapy of the prostate. * Patients who are unwilling or unable to give informed consent. * Patients who have received androgen suppression therapy. * Patients who have received or are receiving chemotherapy for prostate carcinoma. * Patients previously treated with surgery to the prostate (traditional, endoscopic or minimally invasive) including HIFU, TUNA, RITA, microwave, cryotherapy or any curative treatment. * Patients who have undergone radiation therapy for PCa or to the pelvis. * Any condition or history of illness or surgery that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose additional risks to the patient (e.g. significant cardiovascular conditions or allergies). * Patients with a history of non-compliance with medical therapy and/or medical recommendations. * Patients who are unwilling or unable to complete the patient self-assessment questionnaires. * Chronic or acute prostatitis, neurogenic bladder, urinary tract infection, sphincter abnormalities, or any other symptom that prevents normal micturition. * Patients who have participated in a clinical study and/or received treatment with an investigational treatment and/or product within the past 90 days. * Patients with contraindication to MRI (i.e. pacemaker, hip prosthesis, severe claustrophobia, brain aneurysm clip, allergy to MRI contrast agent)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Outcome 1:From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.Number of Participants With Procedure-Related Adverse Events Time Frame: Up to 6 months after procedure Outcome Type: Safety Measure Description: Number and severity of procedure-related adverse events (AEs), graded according to CTCAE v5.0, to evaluate the safety profile of focal Micro-Ultrasound-Guided Focal Laser Ablation (MicroUS-gFLA) in patients with organ-confined intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Unit of Measure: Number of participants
Primary Outcome 2: Technical Success Rate of MicroUS-gFLAFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 monthsPrimary Outcome 2: Technical Success Rate of MicroUS-gFLA Time Frame: At completion of procedure; confirmed during follow-up up to 6 months Outcome Type: Feasibility Measure Description: Proportion of procedures achieving technical success, defined as: successful visualization and MicroUS-guided trocar insertion into the target lesion, and completion of focal laser ablation exactly as planned, as confirmed by intra-procedural imaging and follow-up mpMRI and/or biopsy. Unit of Measure: Percentage of procedures

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary Outcome 1 - Change in PSA Level From BaselineFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.Secondary Outcome 1 - Change in PSA Level From Baseline Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months Outcome Type: Efficacy Measure Description: Change in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level from baseline prior to ablation to 6-month follow-up. Unit of Measure: Change in PSA (ng/mL)
Secondary Outcome 2: Change in Urinary Function (IPSS Score)From enrollment to the end of the treatment at 6 monthsSecondary Outcome 2: Change in Urinary Function (IPSS Score) Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months Outcome Type: Functional Measure Description: Change in urinary function measured using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Unit of Measure: Change in score (IPSS scale)
Secondary Outcome 3: Change in Erectile Function (IIEF-15 Score)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 monthsSecondary Outcome 3: Change in Erectile Function (IIEF-15 Score) Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months Outcome Type: Functional Measure Description: Change in erectile function measured using the International Index of Erectile Function-15 (IIEF-15) questionnaire. Unit of Measure: Change in score (IIEF-15 scale)

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactKateri Corr
kateri.corr@uhn.ca416-946-4501
Backup ContactSangeet Ghai, MD
sangeet.ghai@uhn.ca416-340-4656

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026