Skip to content

Feasibility and Effects of Home-based Physical Activity Intervention in Patients With Breast Cancer in Indonesia

Move to Improve: Investigating the Feasibility of Embedding Physical Activity Into Routine Breast Cancer Care in Indonesia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07338903
Enrollment
36
Registered
2026-01-14
Start date
2022-01-03
Completion date
2024-02-05
Last updated
2026-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms, Physical Fitness

Keywords

Breast neoplasms, Physical activity, Exercise, Walking, Resistance exercise, Physical fitness, Fatigue, Quality of life

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn the impact and implementation of home-based aerobic and resistance training for patients with breast cancer in Indonesia. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the home-based aerobic and resistance training improve physical fitness, fatigue, and quality of life of patients with breast cancer? * Are the benefits of aerobic and resistance training mediated by inflammatory level changes? * What are the barriers and facilitators in implementing the home-based aerobic and resistance training? * Is the home-based aerobic and resistance training feasible to be implemented in Indonesia's setting? To answer those questions, participants will: * Conduct home-based aerobic and resistance training with supervision. * Visit the hospital once every 4 weeks for their routine visits. * Undergo physical fitness test before and after 12 weeks using treadmill test, as well as interviews to assess fatigue, quality of life, and intervention acceptability. * Keep a diary to record the aerobic and resistance training at home. * Undergo routine monitoring by phone every week with the research team.

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL12weeks of home-based aerobic (pedometer-driven walking) and resistance training using therapeutic bands

1. Home-based aerobic training: The aerobic exercise consisted of a walking program based on the number of steps per day, which was recorded using a pedometer (Yamax Digiwalker SW-200, Tokyo, Japan). The target of the aerobic exercise was individually tailored by adding 3000 accumulated steps above their baseline value on 5 days of the week. 2. Home-based resistance training: The resistance training was conducted using a set of resistance bands (Happy Fit®, Jakarta, Indonesia). This training consisted of two sets of biceps curl, triceps extension, chest press, shoulder flexion, shoulder press, lateral extension, seated row, and upright row, with 8-10 repetitions. Patients were instructed to perform each exercise with an average total duration of 10 minutes on 2 days a week at home. The exercises were individually tailored based on participants' strength and range of movement using a set of three color-coded bands representing low, moderate, and high levels of resistance.

Sponsors

University of Leeds
CollaboratorOTHER
Durham University
CollaboratorOTHER
Gadjah Mada University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
17 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with stage I-III hormone-receptor positive breast cancer * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score ≤1 * Had completed primary treatment (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy), except for hormonal treatment * Within 5 years of diagnosis * Able to perform moderate-intensity physical activity as determined by their oncologist and care team * Able to read and write in Indonesian * Willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Had an ejection fraction of \<50% * Evidence of cardiac disease, severe musculoskeletal problems, or other contraindications for exercise.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health-related quality of lifeBaseline and post-intervention (12 weeks)Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Indonesian version of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of global health status, functional scales, and symptom scales. A higher score indicates better health for global health status and functional scales, but represents a higher level of burden for symptom scales.
FatigueBaseline and post-intervention (12 weeks)Fatigue was assessed using the Indonesian version of Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). A higher score on the FSS indicated a more severe level of fatigue. The FSS was also classified as no-to-mild fatigue (FSS \<4.0) and severe fatigue (≥4.0).
Physical fitnessBaseline and post-intervention (12 weeks)Physical fitness was measured using a submaximal treadmill test with the modified Bruce protocol. Treadmill speed and inclination were automatically increased every 3 min (test stage). The test was terminated when participants reached volitional fatigue. Physical fitness was classified as low, fair, average, and good, based on patients' age, treadmill test duration, and predicted VO2peak.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intervention barriers and facilitatorsPost-intervention (12 weeks)Intervention barriers and facilitators were explored using semi-structured interviews using research team-developed interview guide. All interviews were individual and face-to-face, took place in a private room, and audiotaped.
Inflammatory biomarkersBaseline and post-intervention (12 weeks)Venous blood (5 ml) was collected at baseline and post-intervention to measure the levels of inflammatory biomarkers, including CRP, IL-6, and IL-10. The CRP levels were measured using an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) assay (Calbiotech, CR120C), while IL-6 and IL-10 were measured using a Luminex assay (eBioscience, PPX-02-MXYMMK2).
Intervention acceptabilityPost-intervention (12 weeks)Intervention acceptability was explored using semi-structured interviews using a research team-developed interview guide. All interviews were individual and face-to-face, took place in a private room, and were audiotaped.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intervention feasibilityDuring study period (baseline to 12 weeks)Intervention feasibility was determined by (a) recruitment (ratio of the number of participants recruited to the number of eligible participants approached), (b) retention (ratio of the number of participants who completed the 12-week program to the total number of participants enrolled in the study), (c) adherence (the ratio of the number of participants meeting at least 70% of prescribed activities calculated using steps per day, resistance exercise frequency, duration, and intensity to the total number of participants completing the 12-week program). The intervention was defined as feasible if those rates were above 75%.
Adverse eventsDuring study period (baseline to 12 weeks)Adverse events (e.g., dyspnea, tachycardia, nausea, pain, and myalgia) that were reported by participants.

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026