Skip to content

Anastomotic Safety and Surveillance Using Real-time Enhanced Sensing Using xBar

Anastomotic Safety and Surveillance Using Real-time Enhanced Sensing Using xBar

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07337590
Acronym
ASSURE
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-01-13
Start date
2026-03-10
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Brief summary

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of xBar system utilization on clinical outcomes during recovery following colorectal surgery.

Detailed description

The study is intended to evaluate the effect of xBar utilization on clinical outcomes during recovery from colorectal surgery. During the study, patients in the intervention group admitted for low anterior resection surgery will have xBar placed during their index surgery. The overall morbidity, healthcare utilization costs, and stoma utilization of the intervention group will be compared to those of the historical control group, consisting of patients meeting the same inclusion/exclusion criteria of the patients in the intervention group. The xBar system, classified as a non-significant risk device in the pivotal study, is designed as an integrated platform for post-operative monitoring, built to fit into the existing clinical workflow without altering the standard surgical protocol.

Interventions

DEVICExBar™ System

Device: The xBar™ device functions by integrating a sensing electrode array into a standard surgical drain, thereby enabling monitoring without altering standard surgical protocols Description: The Exero Medical xBar™ System is designed to provide continuous postoperative monitoring of gastrointestinal (GI) anastomoses to support the early identification of anastomotic leaks. The device functions by integrating a sensing electrode array into a standard surgical drain, thereby enabling monitoring without altering standard surgical protocols.

Sponsors

Exero Medical Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study will include two cohorts: * Interventional Cohort: Approximately 80 eligible subjects with colorectal cancer undergoing elective low anterior resection with anastomosis, without concomitant diversion, who meet all study inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. * Historical Control Cohort: A de-identified historical cohort consisting of a matched population that underwent surgical procedures during 2023. Historical data will include subject demographics, initial diagnosis, index surgery details, tumor location, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), and readmission rates following the index colorectal surgery.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Interventional Cohort 1. Adults (≥21 years) scheduled for elective low anterior resection (by any surgical technique), due to colorectal cancer 2. Expected anastomosis within 10 cm from the anal verge 3. Usage of drain during the surgery (to be confirmed during the surgery) 4. Willing and able to comply with the study follow up and able and agree to provide informed consent. Historical Cohort 1. Adults aged ≥21 years at the time of surgery. 2. Underwent a low anterior resection (LAR) for malignant colorectal disease. 3. Documented colorectal anastomosis located \<10cm from the anal verge, or documented tumor \<10cm from the anal verge. Complete documentation for the index hospitalization and for the required 12-month follow-up period, or up to stoma take down procedure whichever came first.

Exclusion criteria

Interventional Cohort 1. Subjects with benign disease 2. Contraindication for surgery and/or general anesthesia. 3. Known pregnancy or lactation. 4. Subjects receiving prophylactic stoma formation during index surgery (to be confirmed intraoperatively) 5. Known electronic devices implanted in the chest or the abdominal cavity (e.g., pacemaker, cardioverter/defibrillator). 6. Major medical or psychiatric illness or condition, or other factors that may affect general health or ability to adhere to the follow-up schedule. 7. Known allergic reactions to materials used in the components of the xBar system, i.e., silicone, rubber and stainless-steel. 8. Participation in another interventional study during the xBar system usage. Historical Cohort 1\. LAR performed for benign or non-oncologic indications (e.g., diverticulitis, inflammatory bowel disease, non-malignant strictures, fistula).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint-Demonstrate non-inferiority between the study interventional and historical cohortsAt the time points of 30 and 90 days following index surgeryNon-inferiority of the mean Modified Comprehensive Complication Index (MCCI) of the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population at 30 days following the index surgery, compared with the MCCI of the matched historical cohort.
Primary Safety Endpoint - No Unexpected Serious Adverse Device Events within the Intent to Treat population during the study period ( up to 365 days following index surgery)from the date of index surgery up to 365 days following the index surgeryLack of unanticipated serious adverse events related to the xBar system or xBar procedure during the study period ( up to 365 days from the index surgery)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Stoma-Free patients during the study follow upTime points 30 days, 90 days, 6 months and 12 months following the index surgeryComparison of the number of stoma-free patients in the intervention group vs. the historical cohort at postoperative day 30, postoperative day 90, 6 months, and 12 months. (in %)
Sensitivity and specificity of xBar outcomeAs from Visit 0 (Day of Surgery -drain placement) through the discharge visits (drain removal as per routine practice), anticipated average 3 days.Evaluation of xBar's leak detection performance (Sensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value, Positive Predictive Value).
1. Comparison of MCCI Comorbidity Index (between study cohorts) 2. Number of Stome-Free patients during the study follow up 3. Sensitivity and specificity of xBar outcomeAt timepoints of 30, 90 ,180 and 365 days following the index surgery1. Comparison of MCCI (Comorbidity Index) score based on National Surgical Quality Improvement Program scores, length of stay and readmission events at postoperative day 30 in the intervention group VS the historical cohort 2. Comparison of percentages of stoma-free patients in the intervention group vs. the historical cohort at POD30, POD90, 6 months, and 12 months. 3. Evaluation of xBar's leak detection performance (Sensitivity, Specificity, Negative Predictive Value, Positive Predictive Value).

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTIlana Fishman
ilana.fishman@exeromedical.com+972547545065
CONTACTRuth Stone
ruth.stone@exeromedical.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 17, 2026