Co-Development and Validation of Colonic Symptom Pictograms for Young People

Abdominal Pain (AP), Bloating, Constipation - Functional, Flatulence, IBS, Constipation Predominant, Nausea and Vomitting

children and adolescents, pictograms, co-design, validation

Severe constipation affects 10% of children, often leading to significant physical and emotional distress. While constipation is commonly associated with impaired bowel movements, it is fundamentally linked to abnormalities in colonic motility - the coordinated contractions that facilitate passage of stool through the colon and out of the body. Diagnosis of constipation is based upon the Rome IV criteria, which assess symptoms as reported or remembered over the previous 3 months. However, reporting symptoms experienced can be challenging for children and young people for many reasons, such as the overlap of sensations, including fullness, bloating, and discomfort, and an inability to recall or precisely distinguish and describe what they are feeling. This study intends to design, develop, and validate symptom pictograms for children aged 8-17 with colonic or lower gut symptoms.

Severe refractory constipation affects 10% of children, often leading to significant physical and emotional distress. While constipation is commonly associated with impaired bowel movements, it is fundamentally linked to abnormalities in colonic motility - the coordinated contractions that facilitate passage of stool through the colon and out of the body. Diagnosis of constipation is based upon the Rome IV criteria, which assess symptoms as reported or remembered over the previous 3 months. However, reporting symptoms experienced can be challenging for children and young people for many reasons, such as an overlap of sensations, such as fullness, bloating, and discomfort, and an inability to recall or precisely distinguish and describe what they are feeling. An earlier study approved by the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee (HDEC reference 2022 FULL 12705) designed, developed, and validated a set of upper gastric symptom pictograms to help children and young people record their symptoms during a test called body surface gastric mapping (BSGM). The use of these symptom pictograms has enabled improved correlation of gastric activity with symptoms to assist in the diagnostic process. This study intends to build on this knowledge and apply it to design, develop, and validate symptom pictograms for children aged 8-17 with colonic or lower gut symptoms. Objective To co-design, develop, and validate a set of pictograms representing lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms that are easily understood and useful for children and young people aged 8-17 years. The pictograms will support improved symptom communication, enhance clinical assessment, and be evaluated for comprehension, acceptability, and utility during investigations. Study Design and Methodology: A multi-phase, mixed-methods study incorporating participatory co-design, iterative prototyping, and validation testing with children and young people aged 8-17 years. Study Population Children and young people aged between 8-17-years with and without lower gastrointestinal symptoms. Participant Numbers Phase One: A review of current guidelines and symptom questionnaires to confirm core colonic symptoms relevant to refractory constipation, and a web-based search for images depicting these symptoms to identify common concepts. Final selection will be confirmed by the research team and clinical advisors. Phase Two: Co-design. A minimum of 30 children and young people. Phase Three: Pictogram Development and Refinement based on Phase I, and check the designs for clarity with a group of young people before the validation phase. Phase Four: Validation: At least 80 children and young people with and without lower gastrointestinal symptoms such as constipation. Inclusion Criteria For all phases, the main inclusion criteria for all children and young people participants are that they are, * aged between 8-17 years, * able and willing to complete the tasks, and * communicate in English or be supported by a caregiver, whānau (family), or responsible adult to participate Criteria for Evaluation Phase One: Thematic analysis of symptom concepts and visual ideas, and identification of the symptoms that will be designed and presented visually Phase Two: Gather pictures of symptoms drawn by young people. Review of symptom concepts drawn by participants, reviewing differences and similarities by different ages, sex, and ethnicity (as appropriate), such as facial expressions, colours, and prompts used. Design new colonic symptom pictograms that reflect the outcome of Phases One and Two. Phase Three: Confirm the clarity and qualitative feedback on preferred styles and features of the new pictograms. Phase Four: Following ISO standard 9186, Comprehension Validity (translucency and transparency) and content validity index metrics, the pictograms will be evaluated for understanding and agreement and validated against existing tools. Statistical Methods Phases Two and Three: A convenience sample will be adopted, so no power analyses have been calculated. Phase Four: The proposed minimum of 80 participants is expected to be sufficient to test the guessability, translucency, and validity of six to ten pictograms and provide precision about the mean and variance for the consistency, reliability, and construct validity. (Boateng et al. 2018) Analysis Phase One: A review of common themes, symptom concepts, and visual ideas will be used to identify the relevant symptoms that need to be co-designed. Phase Two: A review of the common themes, images, and prompts to enable new pictograms to be designed and developed Phase Three: A review of the responses for each symptom pictogram recognition and understanding. Phase Four: Descriptive and comparative statistics will be utilised. Translucency will be assessed using a visual analogue scale, ranging from 0 (complete lack of correlation) to 5 (very high correlation agreement). Achieving an agreement of ≥3 is identified as an acceptable level of correlation between the pictogram and its meaning. Validity will be evaluated using the Content Validation Index (CVI) and Pearson's correlation coefficient equations, with internal reliability assessed using Cronbach's α. A CVI greater than 80% and a coefficient level above 0.65 are acceptable.

No related papers found yet.