Skip to content

Effect of Knee Extensor Training on the Lumbar Spine

Knee Extensor-Focused Biomechanical Intervention for Pain, Posture, and Disability in Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07337213
Enrollment
128
Registered
2026-01-13
Start date
2026-02-01
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2026-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non Specific Low Back Pain

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if knee extensor training with different protocols works to treat LBP in adults.. The main questions it aims to answer are: What are the comparative effects of open and closed kinetic chain knee extensor strengthening exercises versus lumbar stabilization exercises on lumbar curvature, postural control, and disability in individuals with non-specific low back pain? 1.4.2. How does open kinetic chain knee extensor strengthening affect pain, functional capacity, and lumbar spine stability compared to closed kinetic chain exercises in individuals with non-specific low back pain? 1.4.3 What is the effect of open kinetic chain knee extensor strengthening on pain, functional capacity, and lumbar spine stability compared to conventional lumbar muscle exercises in individuals with non-specific low back pain? 1.4.4 What is the effect of closed kinetic chain knee extensor strengthening on pain, functional capacity, and lumbar spine stability compared to conventional lumbar muscle exercises in individuals with non-specific low back pain? 1.4.5 What is the effect of open kinetic chain knee extensor strengthening on pain, functional capacity, and lumbar spine stability in individuals with non-specific low back pain? 1.4.6 What is the effect of close kinetic chain knee extensor strengthening on pain, functional capacity, and lumbar spine stability in individuals with non-specific low back pain? 1.4.7 What is the effect of conventional lumbar extensor strengthening on pain, functional capacity, and lumbar spine stability in individuals with non-specific low back pain Researchers will compare three different exercise protocols to a control group (will not receive exercise) to see if knee extensor training has an effect on problems associated with LBP. Participants will: * Exercise three times per week for 8 weeks * Be assessed before, 4 weeks after, and 8 weeks after intervention

Interventions

OTHERback strengthening exercise

strengthening exercise to lumbar extensors

OTHEROKC Exercise

knee extensor OKC exercise added to the lumbar strengthening exercise

OTHERCKC Exercise

knee extensor CKC exercise added to the lumbar strengthening exercise

OTHERCKC and OKC Exercise

knee extensor OKC and CKC exercise added to the lumbar strengthening exercise

Sponsors

Cairo University
CollaboratorOTHER
Taif University
CollaboratorOTHER
Lincoln University College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

I. Males aged 40 to 60 years, II. nonsmokers, III. with normal body mass index IV. of Saudi nationality, V. office workers, VI. suffering from chronic NLBP for 12 weeks or more with a moderate disability according to the Oswestry Disability Index (score of 21 - 40%) moderate activity level according to the Arabic version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form .

Exclusion criteria

I. Previous spinal surgery, fracture, deformity, or disease. II. Neurological deficit and Lower limb deformity or fracture, or disease. III. Mental or psychological illness. The Arabic version of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to screen for common mental disorders such as depression and anxiety, uses a cut-off score to distinguish between individuals with and without significant psychological distress. A score of 7 or below is generally considered normal, indicating no significant psychological distress (Al-Subaie et al., 1998). IV. Systematic chronic illnesses such as hypertension, cardiac and respiratory disorders, and diabetes mellitus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean change in the Lumbar lordosis Cobb angle in degrees measured by X-ray8 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean change of LBP intensity from the baseline measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale8 weeksMinimum Value: 0, which represents no pain. Maximum Value: 10, which represents worst imaginable pain, worst possible pain, or most intense pain imaginable Higher scores indicate a worse outcome
Mean change in the quality of Life score as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index8 weeksMinimum Value: 0%, which represents the highest possible level of functioning and independence (no disability). Maximum Value: 100%, which represents the lowest possible level of functioning and total dependence
Mean change in the muscle strength measured by the Hand-held dynamometer8 weeksA higher score indicate improvement
Mean change in the posture control measured by the stare exursion test8 weeksHigher scores mean a better outcome

Contacts

Primary ContactLamiaa K Elsayyad, Assistant professor
dr.elsayyadlamiaa@gmail.com+201095366120
Backup ContactHatem H Allam, Assistant professor
hatem.lamiaa@gmail.com+966543321736

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026