Skip to content

Evaluation of Tumor Resection and Reconstruction With Prosthetic Implants

Valutazione Resezioni Oncologiche e Ricostruzione Con Utilizzo di Impianti Protesici in Chirurgia Oncologica Ortopedica (Evaluation of Oncologic Resections and Reconstruction Using Prosthetic Implants in Orthopedic Oncologic Surgery)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07337018
Acronym
RERIO
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-01-13
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2028-11-30
Last updated
2026-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Tumor

Brief summary

Bone can be the site of primary malignant tumors or, more commonly, secondary lesions. The most frequent primary tumors are osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma, whereas the malignancies that most commonly metastasize to bone include breast, prostate, lung, kidney, and thyroid cancers. For the treatment of these conditions-and, in some cases, for locally aggressive benign diseases-a surgical approach is often required, which may result in substantial bone loss. Most commercially available prostheses commonly used in orthopedic surgery are not always suitable, either because of the anatomical location of the procedure or the type of resection planned, and thus the extent of the bone defect to be reconstructed. Therefore, specific prosthetic implants designed for oncologic surgery are required. For this reason, modular prostheses have been developed, allowing reconstruction of bone defects of varying sizes across different anatomical districts. In recent years, the development and use of 3D-printing technology for producing custom-made prostheses has also increased, with the aim of reconstructing bone defects in areas that are difficult to treat and achieving an accurate reproduction of the patient's anatomy. This technology enables reconstruction in a wide range of skeletal sites. Additionally, it allows for preoperative planning on printed anatomical models and opens the possibility of integrating materials with adjuvant-related properties into the prosthetic design, such as photothermal therapy or antimicrobial features. Although numerous studies on this topic are available in the literature, they frequently involve small patient cohorts. There is therefore a need to expand case series with longer follow-ups to better assess the reliability and effectiveness of these treatment strategies in the development of reconstructive orthopedic oncologic surgery.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 30 and 70 years; Diagnosis of primary malignant or locally aggressive benign bone tumors, or secondary bone lesions with a primary diagnosis of breast, lung, prostate, kidney, or thyroid cancer; Extensive bone loss precluding the use of currently available prostheses or standard surgical techniques; Use of modular or custom-made prostheses produced with 3D-printing technology; minimum follow-up of 12 months; (For patients in the retrospective phase) completion of evaluation questionnaires during outpatient follow-ups; Obtaining Informed Consent, except for deceased patients enrolled in the retrospective phase of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with disease spread to other bone segments; Age \<30 years or \>70 years; Patients who have undergone previous surgical procedures on the involved segment; Follow-up of less than 1 year; Incomplete clinical or radiological data sets; Inability to obtain Informed Consent, except for deceased patients enrolled in the retrospective phase of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Karnofsky Performance StatusFrom enrollment for at least one yearPostoperative quality of life and functional status assessed using the Karnofsky Performance Status score.
Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) ScoreAt final follow-upPostoperative functional outcome assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system.
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) ScoreFrom enrollment for at least one yearUpper-limb functional outcome assessed using the QuickDASH questionnaire in patients with upper extremity involvement
Oxford Knee ScoreFrom enrollment for at least one yearKnee functional outcome assessed using the Oxford Knee Score in patients with knee involvement
Harris Hip ScoreFrom enrollment for at least one yearHip functional outcome assessed using the Harris Hip Score in patients with hip involvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of postoperative complicationsFrom enrollment for at least one yearPostoperative complications will be assessed through clinical evaluation and review of medical records, supported by imaging and laboratory findings when indicated. Complications include periprosthetic infection, implant loosening, wound dehiscence, dislocation (for implants including an articular component), and periprosthetic fracture. Each complication will be recorded as present or absent according to standard clinical diagnostic criteria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026