Lung Lesions, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Conditions
Keywords
Hypnosis
Brief summary
This is a single-center prospective cohort study evaluating the impact of a simple audio recording hypnosis system on the occurrence of artifacts on 4D CT scans in patients requiring SBRT radiotherapy for lung lesions (peripheral or central). The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the use of a hypnotic recording on the reduction of artifacts in 4D CT scans for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer. The secondary objectives are to evaluate: * the impact of hypnotic recording on the reduction of artifacts on intrathoracic structures (trachea, main bronchi, diaphragm, lesions, heart, and lungs), * the regularity of respiratory amplitude, * the regularity of respiratory rate, * the volume of Internal Target Volume (ITV), * the reproducibility of ITV volume, * patient satisfaction. 1. Before this dosimetric scan, the patient will complete a self-administered questionnaire on anxiety: the HADS-A questionnaire (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-only questions relating to anxiety). During this examination, the MERM explains the dosimetric scan procedure to the patient. After the immobilization system has been set up in accordance with the department's standard protocol, a 4D CT scan will be performed while asking the patient to breathe regularly. In the event of an artifact at the level of the lesion, a second 4D CT scan will be performed under the same conditions. 2. The hypnotic audio recording will be played through the room's speakers. The hypnotic recording is structured in three stages, with a 5-minute induction phase, a 5-minute working phase, and finally a 5-minute return phase. After 5 minutes of playback, the 4D CT scan for the study is performed using the same acquisition parameters as the free 4D CT scan. 3. Following the first radiotherapy session and for all patients included in the study, a 4D dosimetric scan will be performed using the hypnotic recording again, as described above, in order to assess the inter-fraction reproducibility of the ITV volume. Following this second 4D CT scan under hypnosis, patient satisfaction will be assessed (using a Likert scale questionnaire).
Interventions
OTHERHypnotic record
The hypnotic audio recording will be played through the room's speakers. The hypnotic recording is structured in three stages, with a 5-minute induction phase, a 5-minute working phase, and finally a 5-minute return phase.
Sponsors
Centre Leon Berard
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age ≥18 years, * Indication for lung SBRT, peripheral or central lesion, * Patient new to hypnosis (medical or stage hypnosis), * Patient covered by social security or equivalent, * Dated and signed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
* Indication for treatment with abdominal compression, * Patient undergoing treatment for multiple lesions in the same treatment sequence, * Patient with an ultra-central lesion (distance to the mediastinum \< 2 cm), * Patient already included in this protocol, * Cognitive or physical disorders preventing the trial from proceeding smoothly, * Patient with one or more active psychotic disorders (such as schizophrenia), * Patients suffering from severe dissociative disorders, * Patient who does not understand French or is deaf, * Pregnant or breastfeeding women, * Patient under guardianship or curatorship or deprived of liberty.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Difference between the proportion of 4D CT scans acquired under normal conditions and showing at least 1 artifact at the level of the lesion and the proportion of 4D CT scans acquired under hypnosis and showing >= 1artifact at the level of the lesion | Throught study completion, an average of 1 month |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The difference between the minimum and maximum respiratory amplitude for the two acquisition conditions (with and without hypnotic recording); | Throught study completion, an average of 1 month |
| The difference between the minimum and maximum respiratory rate for the two acquisition conditions (with and without hypnotic recording); | Until the end of the study |
| The proportion of 4D CT scans showing at least one artifact in lung volume for both acquisition conditions (with and without hypnotic recording) | Throught study completion, an average of 1 month |
| The difference in ITV size, in the craniocaudal axis, on 4D CT scans acquired under hypnotic recording | Throught study completion, an average of 1 month |
| The satisfaction questionnaire score (5-point Likert scales) following the second 4D CT scan under hypnosis. | Throught study completion, an average of 1 month |
| The difference in ITV volume between the two acquisition conditions (with and without hypnotic recording) | Throught study completion, an average of 1 month |
Contacts
Primary ContactCéline KERMORGANT
Backup ContactSéverine METZGER
Outcome results
None listed