Skip to content

Diagnostic Performance of PIC Cystogram vs VCUG in Children

Comparison of the Effectiveness of PIC Cystogram and VCUG in the Diagnosis of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07334821
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-01-12
Start date
2026-02-01
Completion date
2026-04-01
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric Urology

Keywords

PIC Cystogram, VCUG, Vesicoureteral Reflux, Children

Brief summary

The goal of this interventional diagnostic clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the diagnostic effectiveness of PIC cystography and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) for the detection of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children undergoing endoscopic procedures, including those who previously underwent VCUG for urinary tract infection (UTI) or other indications, as well as children who did not require VCUG. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does PIC cystography detect VUR at a rate comparable to VCUG? How well do PIC cystography and VCUG correlate in identifying low-grade versus high-grade VUR? Researchers will compare PIC cystography findings with prior VCUG results to determine agreement between the two diagnostic methods and their ability to detect clinically relevant reflux. Participants will: Undergo PIC cystography performed during endoscopic surgery Have contrast instilled near each ureteral orifice under fluoroscopic monitoring Be evaluated for the presence and grade of vesicoureteral reflux

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPIC cystography

PIC cystography is performed intraoperatively during endoscopic surgery. A pediatric cystoscope is positioned adjacent to each ureteral orifice, and contrast medium is instilled by gravity from a height of 1 meter under fluoroscopic guidance. The presence and grade of vesicoureteral reflux are recorded for each renal unit. The procedure is carried out in a standardized manner by an investigator blinded to prior VCUG findings

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTVCUG

VCUG performed

Sponsors

Tarik Emre Sener
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Single-blind (physician blinded to VCUG results)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children aged 0-18 years * Undergoing endoscopic urological surgery * With or without a prior VCUG performed for urinary tract infection or other clinical indications * Availability of VCUG results for participants who previously underwent VCUG * Written informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians

Exclusion criteria

* History of previous ureteral reimplantation or anti-reflux surgery * Known neurogenic bladder or severe lower urinary tract dysfunction * Active urinary tract infection at the time of endoscopic procedure * Inability to undergo fluoroscopic imaging (e.g., contrast allergy) * Incomplete clinical or imaging data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Detection of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) by PIC cystography compared with VCUGDuring endoscopic surgery (single intraoperative assessment)Detection of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) by PIC cystography compared with VCUG, assessed as the presence or absence of reflux and categorized as low-grade (Grade 1-3) or high-grade (Grade 4-5) on a renal unit basis.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactTurker Altuntas
turkeraltuntas@hotmail.com+905344525700

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026