Skip to content

Evaluation of the Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on the Success of Adult Pulpotomy

Evaluation of the Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on the Success of Adult Pulpotomy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07332026
Acronym
controlled cli
Enrollment
70
Registered
2026-01-12
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult Pulpotomy Success in Diabetic Patients

Brief summary

The aim of the present study will be directed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of adult pulpotomies in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Detailed description

Out of one hundred patients, Seventy Patients were selected from the outpatient clinic at the faculty of dental medicine Al-Azhar University to take part in this study. Diabetic and non diabetic patients aged between 30 and 65 years complaining of irreversible pulpitis related to the lower permanent first or second molar tooth . All patients were clinically reexamined and radiographically assessed using a periapical radiograph.

Interventions

PROCEDUREpulpotomy

complete excision of coronal pulp

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

lower first or second molar diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis in diabetic and non-diabetic patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Outcome assessment3, 6, 12 monthsAssessment of outcome was done using the technique described by Zanini et al. Each patient was evaluated at different time intervals; Treatment was considered successful if there was an intact final restoration, an asymptomatic tooth, and the periapical index score was 1. Treatment was considered Uncertain if the final restoration is intact, asymptomatic tooth, and the periapical index score of 2. Treatment was considered a failure if there was not an intact final restoration, irrelevant clinical symptoms and an irrelevant periapical index score. Treatment was considered a failure if there was an intact final restoration with symptoms and an irrelevant periapical index score. * Treatment was considered a failure if there was an intact final restoration, irrelevant clinical symptoms, and the periapical index was 3 or more.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026