Skip to content

The Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Spinal Anesthesia

Impact of Ultrasound Guidance on the Performance of Spinal Anesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07327801
Enrollment
136
Registered
2026-01-08
Start date
2025-02-01
Completion date
2025-07-30
Last updated
2026-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conventional Palpation Technique, Procedural Performance, Spinal Anesthesia, Ultrasound Guidance

Brief summary

Neuraxial anesthesia is a commonly employed technique for subumbilical surgical procedures due to its effectiveness and safety profile. The advent of ultrasound technology has introduced the possibility of visualizing anatomical landmarks in real time, thereby facilitating more accurate and potentially safer subarachnoid punctures. This study aims to compare conventional spinal anesthesia, based on palpation, with ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia, focusing on procedural ease and overall facilitation. it's a prospective, single-center, randomized, single-blind study. We included patients aged 18 years or older, classified as ASA I or II, scheduled for elective surgery, and who provided written informed consent. Exclusion criteria included failed subarachnoid puncture, conversion to general anesthesia, or the occurrence of major intraoperative complications such as vasovagal episodes or cardiac rhythm disturbances. Participants were randomly assigned, based on a randomization table, into two groups: Group1 (traditional technique), in which spinal anesthesia was performed using the conventional palpation-based method for space localization; and Group2 (ultrasound-guided technique), in which spinal anesthesia was performed under real-time ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome was the total procedure time, measured in seconds from the end of skin antisepsis to the initiation of subarachnoid injection. Secondary outcomes included the number of puncture attempts, the number of needle redirections within the same interspace, the occurrence of procedural incidents, and postoperative complaints such as radicular pain, osseous contact pain, intraoperative paresthesias, and traumatic punctures.

Interventions

DEVICEConventional spinal anesthesia

The spinous processes were then palpated to precisely locate the targeted intervertebral space

A combined sequence was used, beginning with a longitudinal paramedian scan, followed by a 90-degree rotation to obtain a transverse interspinous view. This allowed for the identification of the spinal canal, after which the puncture was performed using dynamic, out-of-plane guidance

Sponsors

Military Hospital of Tunis
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18 years or older. * Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II. * Scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia. * Provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Failed subarachnoid puncture. * Conversion to general anesthesia. * Occurrence of major intraoperative complications (e.g., vasovagal episodes, cardiac rhythm disturbances).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
procedure time60sec

Countries

Tunisia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026