Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Research, Scientific Publishing, Surveys and Questionnaires
Conditions
Brief summary
Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models and conversational tools, is increasingly being used in medical research. These tools may assist researchers at different stages of the scientific process, such as generating research ideas, reviewing the literature, analyzing data, writing manuscripts, and preparing articles for publication. While interest in AI is growing rapidly, there is still limited information on how these tools are actually perceived and used by leading medical researchers. This study aims to better understand the attitudes, perceptions, and self-reported uses of artificial intelligence among corresponding authors who have published in six major international medical journals. These authors play a key role in shaping scientific standards and editorial practices, and their views are essential to understanding how AI may influence the future of medical research. Participants are invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire that asks about their familiarity with AI tools, how and when they use or plan to use them in the research process, the potential benefits they perceive, and the concerns or limitations they identify. The survey also explores participants' expectations regarding transparency, ethical guidance, and journal policies related to the use of artificial intelligence in scientific work.The study is observational and does not involve any medical intervention or collection of personal or health-related data. Participation is voluntary, and responses are fully anonymous.
Interventions
OTHERobservational survey
This is an observational, non-interventional study based on an anonymous online questionnaire. No intervention is administered to participants.
Sponsors
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Study design
Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Participants without any disease, condition, or related symptoms are permitted to participate. This study is a non-clinical, observational survey focusing on attitudes and practices related to artificial intelligence in scientific research, not on health conditions.
Exclusion criteria
* Authors who are not corresponding authors. * Students, residents, interns, or trainees without corresponding author status. * Individuals not involved in biomedical or medical research activities. * Individuals who decline to participate or do not complete the online questionnaire.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-reported attitudes regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process | At the inclusion | Participants report their attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process through multiple-choice and Likert-scale items. Responses are analyzed descriptively; higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes toward the use of artificial intelligence. |
| Perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process | At the inclusion | Participants report their attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process through multiple-choice and Likert-scale items. Responses are analyzed descriptively; higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes toward the use of artificial intelligence. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-reported patterns of use, regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing | At the inclusion | Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations |
| Perceived benefits regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing | At the inclusion | Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations |
| Risk regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing | At the inclusion | Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations |
| Expectations regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing | At the inclusion | Anonymous online questionnaire developed for this study Responses are collected using multiple-choice questions and Likert-scale items. Higher scores reflect greater reported use of artificial intelligence and more positive evaluations of its benefits, while higher concern scores reflect greater perceived risks or limitations |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed