Skip to content

Licorice Extract Gel Versus Diode Laser for Physiologic Gingival Pigmentation

A Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Topical Licorice Extract Gel and Diode Laser 445 nm on Physiologic Gingival Pigmentation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07325825
Enrollment
26
Registered
2026-01-08
Start date
2025-04-01
Completion date
2026-01-01
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Hyperpigmentation

Keywords

Gingival pigmentation, Diode laser, Licorice extract gel

Brief summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of topical licorice extract gel and diode laser (445 nm) in the treatment of physiologic gingival pigmentation. Twenty-four adult patients presenting with physiologic melanin pigmentation in the anterior esthetic zone of the maxillary or mandibular gingiva will be randomly allocated into two equal groups. One group will be treated with diode laser therapy, while the other group will receive topical licorice extract gel. Clinical outcomes will be assessed using standardized gingival pigmentation indices and patient satisfaction questionnaires over a follow-up period of 36 weeks.

Detailed description

This randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted at the outpatient clinic of the Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. Eligible participants aged 18-50 years with physiologic gingival pigmentation will be randomly assigned into two groups. Group A will receive gingival depigmentation using a 445 nm diode laser, while Group B will receive topical licorice extract gel applied three times daily. The intensity and distribution of gingival pigmentation will be evaluated using the Dummett-Gupta Oral Pigmentation Index (DOPI) and Gingival Pigmentation Index (GPI). Patient satisfaction will also be assessed. Clinical evaluations will be performed at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 36 weeks after treatment.

Interventions

DEVICEDiode Laser 445 nm

Gingival depigmentation performed using a diode laser with a wavelength of 445 nm in continuous wave mode at 1 W power.

DRUGLicorice Extract Gel

Topical licorice extract gel applied to pigmented gingival areas three times daily for one month, with continuation for a second and third month if required.

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

intervention (control group): Diode laser 445 nm intervention (test group): topical licorice extract gel

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults (18 to 50 years old) of either sex with physiologic melanin pigmentation in the anterior esthetic zone of the maxillary or mandibular gingiva. * Systemically healthy individuals

Exclusion criteria

* Smokers * Pregnant or lactating females * Patients taking drugs associated with gingival pigmentation * Patients with periodontal disease * History of gingival depigmentation * Known hypersensitivity to licorice extract * Poor oral hygiene * Presence of systemic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in gingival pigmentation intensityBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 36 weeksDegree of gingival pigmentation assessed using the Dummett-Gupta Oral Pigmentation Index (DOPI; scores range from 0 to 3), with higher scores indicating increased pigmentation intensity.
Change in gingival pigmentation distributionBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 36 weeksGingival pigmentation distribution was assessed using the Gingival Pigmentation Index (GPI). The GPI is an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates absence of pigmentation and 3 indicates widespread gingival pigmentation. Higher scores represent greater extent of gingival pigment distribution (worse pigmentation).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Satisfaction3 months post-treatmentParticipant satisfaction was assessed using a study-specific questionnaire consisting of four questions evaluating perceived esthetic improvement, fulfillment of expectations, self-confidence related to smile appearance, and willingness to recommend the treatment. Responses were recorded as categorical (non-numerical) variables, and no numerical scale was calculated. Outcomes were analyzed descriptively, with more favorable responses indicating higher satisfaction.
Postoperative pain intensity (laser group only)Immediately post-procedure, Day 1 and Day 7 postoperativelyPostoperative pain intensity was assessed in the diode laser group only using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; range 0-10), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. This outcome was not applicable to the licorice extract gel group due to the non-invasive nature of the intervention.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026